This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Dior article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days |
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on February 12, 2017, February 12, 2019, February 12, 2021, February 12, 2022, and February 12, 2023. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The overall quality of the article is rather low. A large part of it is dedicated to rather irrelevant criticism; for example, some local criticism in India is given an entire heading and section. It would seem as if some users (no doubt well-intentioned) think that every minor criticism deserves full coverage. That thinking violates WP:DUE. If a controversy receives wide media coverage, such as the Galliano controversy, it probably is due. If there's only minor media coverage, then most likely it is not due for what is a global and major company. Unless there are any objections, I'll do a major clean-up. I'll leave it for a few days if there are comments. Jeppiz ( talk) 21:43, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
The criticism section contained both well-sourced and relevant controversies, but also some that seemed very minor and not reported in any source meeting WP:RS. For Dior, as for any other company, we should certainly report on major controversies (such as the Galliano controversy for Dior) but not every single piece of news, as per both WP:NOTNEWS and WP:DUE. This is especially true for poorly sourced material. Jeppiz ( talk) 10:54, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 21:37, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 September 2022 and 8 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Olivia0831 ( article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Olivia0831 ( talk) 00:16, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
This Dior article states "Dior holds 42.36% shares and 59.01% of voting rights within LVMH" and the LVMH page says "Dior holds 42.36% shares and 59.01% of voting rights within LVMH". I'm missing something; this seems like a cross-ownership issue that should be flagged. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.180.228.131 ( talk) 01:58, 28 July 2023 (UTC)