This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: North Carolina / Charlotte High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject North Carolina (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject North Carolina - Charlotte (assessed as High-importance).

Charlotte is the 6th Largest Metro in the Southeast, not the 5th. Orlando is the 5th, someone needs to change that —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikeef74 ( talk • contribs) 00:12, 21 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Page needs some clean-up; I'll work on it some if others can participate. As always, some clarity must be made between "official," "popular" and "promotional" definitions of the area.

I've attempted to stick with official formats here, and the Triangle, Triad, Upstate SC and Atlanta pages have been good referents. The Atlanta metro page has sections on weather, natural history & storms (I have some research on this that would pertain to the Charlotte area; I've done tornado research for NC/SC; have begun winter storm research, and other people have covered the hurricanes), geography and landscape and a handful of other features that would fit well here.

I want to break the lists into columns to keep them from running too long as well at some point.

If any other contributors can find some public domain or user-created pics to accompany sections, that would be excellent - a stadium pic, a skyline pic, a Crowder's Mountain, Lowes Speedway, one of the big lakes, a historical site like Latta Plantation, one of the campuses, the African-American Cultural Center could all be candidates.

I'll try to reserach the demographics and diversity - it would be nice to flesh that out a little more; ditto for the business and corporate side of the city.

-- Davidals 11:45, 4 October 2006 (UTC) reply

CSA) population of 2,420,745. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 208.104.231.252 ( talk • contribs).

How can the name of a small city in Minas Gerais, Brazil, be re-directed to the Charlotte Metropolitan area? Vogensen ( talk) 08:42, 24 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Since no one even bothered replying to the comment and its nearing being three years old i have now corrected the redirect.If anyone has a problem with that just post it in here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.114.54.101 ( talk) 20:00, 21 May 2010 (UTC) reply

What defines "primary cities?" The list seems to be decided arbitrarily based on a formula that eludes me, and indeed may be editorial in nature. Would it not be better to do away with this designation and simply place all but the anchor city in the "over 10,000" category instead? The alternative would be to place all of the micropolitan cities in the list, which would seem to be the intent behind the "primary" designation. Go2dell ( talk) 06:22, 24 July 2008 (UTC) reply

Just a friendly note: The coordinates are incorrect and point to somewhere in south america — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.254.188.152 ( talk) 17:14, 2 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Thank you for the input. The coordinates were already corrected over a week ago on Nov. 23, 2011. It must have been still showing the old page at a mirror copy from some other site that hadn't updated their page, yet. Else, clear your browser cache and revisit the page. Thank you. -- JoannaSerah ( talk) 19:24, 2 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Why can Charlotte not have it's own "Economy of Charlotte" page? I'm aware Charlotte's economy is discussed on the Charlotte metropolitan area page, but the criteria can be expanded as other cities (Atlanta, Cincinnati, ect) have done. Do you have a problem with Charlotte? Gaknowitall ( talk) 22:22, 1 December 2012 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Charlotte metropolitan area. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{ cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{ nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090718120237/http://www.cgsm.org:80/op/HostCityInformation09.htm to http://www.cgsm.org/op/HostCityInformation09.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— ^{cyberbot II} _{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:01, 1 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Charlotte metropolitan area. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929092950/http://www.charlottechamber.com/index.php?submenu=manufacturing_region&src=gendocs&ref=ManufacturingintheRegion&category=emerging_industry to http://www.charlottechamber.com/index.php?submenu=manufacturing_region&src=gendocs&ref=ManufacturingintheRegion&category=emerging_industry
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140815134909/http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=bkmk to http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=bkmk
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070103210140/http://www.charlotteusa.com:80/index.asp to http://www.charlotteusa.com/index.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070111164533/http://www.charlotteusa.com:80/Regional/regional_communities.asp to http://www.charlotteusa.com/Regional/regional_communities.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{ Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:17, 20 November 2016 (UTC) reply