From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Not the Oldest

See [ [1]]. Several trophy games are older. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.100.200.63 ( talk) 03:11, 3 December 2010 (UTC) reply

How can anybody argue that it's the most heated rivalry in collegiate football? The games are played in 100 degree heat in the middle of a desert... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.181.100.136 ( talk) 20:03, 1 September 2007 (UTC) reply

I know this is old (2010 & 2007), but it should have an explanation. It may "arguably" be the most heated, but that is subjected. However, the trophy is certified by the NCAA as being the oldest rivalry trophy in collegiate football. Furthermore, the game is typically played the Friday after Thanksgiving; therefore, it is not played in 100° heat, but likely in 60° or 50° (if not colder) temperatures...especially considering the Territorial Cup's history of being a night game. Technically, the games are played in a desert, but more accurately, the games are played in urban areas located in the Sonoran Desert. One urban area (Tucson) with over 1 million inhabitants, and the other (Phoenix-Tempe) with over 4 million inhabitants are hardly "in the middle of the desert" or in other words, not in a desolate location.-- 68.98.115.70 ( talk) 05:07, 14 December 2012 (UTC) reply

Recommend to lose the entire Painting section as it has nothing to do with the Territorial Cup nor the game. Basically, its fluff and isn't really accurate anyway. -- 68.99.244.239 ( talk) 06:02, 11 February 2008 (UTC) reply

Image copyright problem with File:Arizona State University logo only.png

The image File:Arizona State University logo only.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --12:42, 2 January 2009 (UTC) reply

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Boise State–Nevada rivalry which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 16:30, 16 June 2013 (UTC) reply

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was no consensus. -- BDD ( talk) 16:46, 14 August 2013 (UTC) reply

Arizona–Arizona State football rivalry Territorial Cup – This article was moved to Arizona–Arizona State football rivalry without discussion. This article previously concerned one of the oldest trophies (if not the oldest) and the move seemed inappropriate given there is no shortage of reliable sources for the trophy being the common name [2] and thus a descriptive title seems out of place. Relisted. BDD ( talk) 20:05, 7 August 2013 (UTC) Labattblueboy ( talk) 20:17, 29 July 2013 (UTC) reply

  • Oppose. While the trophy is well known, many or most sources for the rivalry only discuss it in passing, if at all, using a descriptive name instead, for instance: [3] [4] [5] and [6]. The current title is more in line with how the sources discuss the subject and is more natural and recognizable to readers. It has been the trend in articles in Category:College football rivalries in the United States to eschew the often obscure trophy names and fan nick names in favor of more recognizable descriptive titles.-- Cúchullain t/ c 16:10, 6 August 2013 (UTC) reply
No doubt that the rivalry is notable and potentially worthy of it's own article. However, the trophy is onto itself a notable object and subject and it should not have been moved to fill a gap in rivalry content. Duality for competitions and their associated trophies is not all all uncommon (a la Stanley Cup and Stanley Cup finals).-- Labattblueboy ( talk) 04:50, 7 August 2013 (UTC) reply
I've yet to see one of these college sports rivalry articles where material on the rivalry and its trophy weren't better dealt with in one place. This isn't any different considering the trophy material is poorly cited. The solution here is cleanup under the current name - with reliable sources this time - not writing separate articles. Cúchullain t/ c 22:29, 8 August 2013 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Vandalism

The page has been vandalized with references to Alabama and Auburn. 24.249.175.130 ( talk) 16:19, 26 November 2013 (UTC) reply

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Arkansas–LSU football rivalry which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 17:30, 7 December 2013 (UTC) reply

Name

According to this, ASU's name was "Arizona Territorial Normal School" in 1889. It had previously been known as "Territorial Normal School at Tempe". Additionally, the link is superior as it points to History of Arizona State University, where more historical information can be found than at the main page. I'll be reverting the change and adding this source.-- Cúchullain t/ c 13:12, 27 May 2014 (UTC) reply

Sorry, got the dates wrong - it was Normal School of Arizona according to the link. It may be worth just saying it once and then going with "Tempe Normal School", since that was not only the school's official name from 1901-1925, it also seems to be used as a generic conventional name for the school's early history before it became the State Teachers' College.-- Cúchullain t/ c 13:39, 27 May 2014 (UTC) reply

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Arizona–Arizona State football rivalry/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

The opening paragraph is primarily concerned with the claim that the Little Brown Jug is the oldest rivalry trophy in collegiate football. It is both poorly written and off topic. The citation is a dead link, if such a page ever existed.

The section titled "Arizon-Arizona State rivalry" reviews each schools athletic programs, but offers very little information about the rivalry.

CarneSeca ( talk) 12:52, 20 November 2008 (UTC) reply

Substituted at 21:34, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Arizona–Arizona State football rivalry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{ Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:09, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply