This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article contains a translation of Арбитражная комиссия Мирной конференции по Югославии from ru.wikipedia. |
An immense section of the article is dedicated to the criticisms of the findings of the Arbitration Commission. I’ve serched trugh the web, and found more about the author of such criticisms, Peter Radan from Australia. Well, first, this guy seems irrelevant in the international community scene, and second, he is a clearly minoritarian Serb nationalist apologist, who worked closely even with another most-known apoplogist, the Serbian-American Srđa Trifković.
My question is: is his criticisms so important to be placed in the article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.1.168.220 ( talk) 08:28, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
While criticism was appliable to the Civic war in FRY, it would be interesting to know that this agreement could be also a basis of claim that Kosovo is internationally recognoized part of Serbia, as it was in the time of the decision by FRY constitution. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.121.39.186 ( talk) 20:27, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Radan's criticisms are pretty standard amongst a majority of historians. This article doesnt even go in the litany of criticisms of the commission's findings amongst legal professionals. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
213.89.168.24 (
talk) 10:05, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
I just fixed the clearly anachronistic part of the title, but one question still remains - did the conference have a "peace" prefix or was it implicit?
Regardless of that difference, when I click on the last page of either of these, I get "Page 5 of 42 results". So it looks like it's largely synonymous, but it should be possible to lose the extra word since the title is already long enough. -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 12:39, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
Can someone explain why is it insisted in the article that Uti Possidetis Juris was applied in the Yugoslavia fallout? Neither side kept what was theirs at the time The Commission made it's opinion, and there was no other agreement. These should have been the borders if Uti Possidetis was to be applied. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9a/Map_of_war_in_Yugoslavia,_1992.png Cheerz, Mike.
The link for this source is dead: Allain Pellet (1992). "The Opinions of the Badinter Arbitration Committee: A Second Breath for the Self-Determination of Peoples" (PDF). European Journal of International Law 3 (1): 178–185.
Maybe this is the right link: http://ejil.oxfordjournals.org/content/3/1/178.full.pdf+html
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Arbitration Commission of the Peace Conference on Yugoslavia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:31, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Arbitration Commission of the Peace Conference on Yugoslavia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:45, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
In the article is is stated that the Arbitration Commission handed out 15 opinions, however only 10 are listed in content and summarized. In short: 1. How many opinions did this commission issue? 2. If the number is greater that those summarized in section 2 of this article, where are the remaining ones? 91.150.112.250 ( talk) 21:48, 6 July 2021 (UTC)