This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: State Legislatures Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. State Legislatures. Politics High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Wisconsin Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Elections and Referendums This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Primary: I am not certain, but i think the primary is non-partisan, between all challengers who file,and there is no specific democratic or republican primary, so those labels should be changed, if they are wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.90.129.140 ( talk) 14:00, 9 July 2011 (UTC) reply

The sections on Republicans and Democrats ought to have consistent formatting. So both sections ought to list the total number of valid signatures (if it can be found) or neither should. -- JamesAM ( talk) 03:34, 4 July 2011 (UTC) reply

It the information is available for one, but not the other, it doesn't make sense to delete information just because we don't currently have access to the equivalent information for the second party. Keeping it acts as a prod for editors to go forth and look for the information; removing makes it highly unlikely we will ever have the information for both. Wikipedia is a project, not a completed work. As such, we shouldn't delete things just because something else has yet to be done. If this is issue is significant for you, you can either try to find the information for yourself. For the time being, I'll put a {{ incomplete}} template with a comment next to it explaining the incompleteness. - Rrius ( talk) 04:27, 4 July 2011 (UTC) reply

What's up with labeling some of the candidates in the primaries "Fake"? Are they some sort of dummy candidate on the ballet, or is this a bit of vandalism, or what? Buddy431 ( talk) 19:41, 9 November 2011 (UTC) reply

This removal was disputed simply on the grounds that it's a lot of text. It's built on shoddy references, it's fundamentally incomplete, and has no bearing on the article 4 years later. Why should we keep it? Thargor Orlando ( talk) 16:39, 16 February 2015 (UTC) reply

With no further protests, I'll remove this section. Thargor Orlando ( talk) 22:23, 25 February 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Wisconsin Senate recall elections, 2011. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{ cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{ nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110715134552/http://www.sheboyganpress.com:80/article/20110711/SHE0101/107110373/Fake-Democrats-face-real-ones-Wisconsin-Senate-recall-primaries to http://www.sheboyganpress.com/article/20110711/SHE0101/107110373/Fake-Democrats-face-real-ones-Wisconsin-Senate-recall-primaries

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— ^{cyberbot II} _{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:43, 26 February 2016 (UTC) reply