This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Women in the workforce article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Women in the Workforce was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 18 April 2021 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Women in the workforce. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
This article was the subject of an educational assignment in Spring 2015. Further details were available on the "Education Program:California State University, Channel Islands/Ethics for a Free World (Spring 2015)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
The references on this topic are going to get very lengthy. The topic badly needs to be split into sub-topics on women in individual professional areas. -- Lquilter ( talk) 17:15, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
I started this article with a brief summary at the top, but doing a cursory review of the literature has suggested some sections for the article.
There are lots of other sub-topics to women in the workforce. Thoughts on how to arrange, and other missing subtopics? -- Lquilter ( talk) 18:04, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Women in the workforce. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 10:31, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
I added a source about workplace discrimination of female. This article is a good explanation of women's inequalities in the workplace. "THE DISRUPTERS. By: KOLHATKAR, SHEELAH, New Yorker, 0028792X, 11/20/2017, Vol. 93, Issue 37" Mengrui Li ( talk) 21:33, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
This article's bibliography is huge—the longest I've seen. It may be time to WP:SPLITOUT the bibliography to a separate article, like the other bibliography articles in Wikipedia:List of bibliographies? Biogeographist ( talk) 17:52, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
"In 2017 there are around 74.6 million women in the civilian labor force[4]."
What is the interest of having this passage in the introduction? This figure is about the US's female workforce not worldwide. As such, it should be removed.
176.158.146.38 ( talk) 19:06, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
This is of course because of the problem added in 2020. Oakime ( talk) 17:43, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 September 2023 and 15 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Gaquach ( article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Peinini ( talk) 22:01, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
I added inline citations where it was marked as inline citations needed. -- Gaquach ( talk) 12:50, 1 December 2023 (UTC)