From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleTom Brady was one of the Sports and recreation good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 8, 2006 Good article nomineeListed
February 12, 2006 Peer reviewReviewed
April 25, 2006 Featured article candidateNot promoted
June 10, 2009 Good article reassessmentDelisted
September 10, 2012 Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Delisted good article


After NFL Career Proposed Section

From the continuous involvement with Brady and the media, especially with Fox Sports, he looks to be staying within the NFL world for at least 5 more years.


That being said, is an after career section in order?(Support/Oppose) IEditPolitics ( talk) 01:28, 16 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected edit request on 11 March 2024

In the paragraph where it talks about his dynasty with the pats, you can actually say he's the only player in the NFL to win 3 super bowls in a 5 years period twice, making his team become a 2 time dynasty (being that a dynasty is described as winning 3 out of 5 championships in every sport) 212.178.231.231 ( talk) 12:04, 11 March 2024 (UTC) reply

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. M.Bitton ( talk) 14:55, 11 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Best Player?

Very simple topic, I see on the opening paragraph it says he is widely considered the greatest *quarterback*. While this is certainly true, I would argue that he is widely considered the greatest *player* period. Even the sources used to cite that sentence support that he is considered the greatest player, not just greatest quarterback. 2601:483:4B7E:BFD0:BC48:2787:F758:BE4E ( talk) 04:40, 10 May 2024 (UTC) reply

You could argue that, but it's not a definitive fact that he's widely considered the greatest players. Some like to point to Jerry Rice or Lawrence Taylor as the greatest for example. Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:55, 10 May 2024 (UTC) reply
It is difficult to compare players and present findings that can make opinions seem like facts. He is no doubt the most accomplished player in NFL history in terms of Super Bowl championships and numerous passing categories. How does that compare to other positions? We may never have a perfect answer. I'd like to think he is greatest player ever in my opinion just because of how important the quarterback position is, but some things are left to opinions and can never be concrete. Red Director ( talk) 14:01, 10 May 2024 (UTC) reply
Couldn't agree more, it makes it an impossible discussion to find a conclusion to. Hey man im josh ( talk) 14:15, 10 May 2024 (UTC) reply

"Winningest"

Fyi, I tried to revert you @ Conan The Librarian, but you self reverted. I wanted to note a few sources:

"Winningest" seems like an acceptable word to me. Pinging @ Frank Anchor. It's just that it's typically used when discussing sports. Hey man im josh ( talk) 17:45, 13 June 2024 (UTC) reply

As stated in my edit summary, “winningest” seems like a better option than “most successful.” The former literally means having the most wins, which is an indisputable, objective criterion. The latter is more ambiguous of a term since being successful is a lot more subjective in nature. The sentence could also be changed to something along the lines of “Brady leads all NFL quarterbacks with 251 regular season wins and 35 postseason wins.” Frank Anchor 20:32, 13 June 2024 (UTC) reply
It's a common American term. The arguments are usually for non-American readers and MOS:COMMONALITY. — Bagumba ( talk) 05:19, 14 June 2024 (UTC) reply
Thanks all, it's a word I particularly remember from "winningest kittens" on kittenwars, and had assumed some jokey construction - perhaps by them - that had gained Internet parlance though googling led me to similar references. I'm a bit sceptical it belongs here for the reasons stated but unlike some words with a regional constraint this one is at least easily interpretable. I would also imagine it's used elsewhere in similar articles so I won't argue it further. Conan The Librarian ( talk) 10:27, 14 June 2024 (UTC) reply