This article is within the scope of WikiProject Highways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
highways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HighwaysWikipedia:WikiProject HighwaysTemplate:WikiProject HighwaysHighways articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to
participate, please visit the
project page, where you can join the project, participate in
relevant discussions, and see
lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 17:09, June 18, 2024 (
JST,
Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles
Is there some particular reason this is called the Tokyo Wan Aqua-Line, instead of more obvious "Tokyo Bay Aqua-Line"?
Jpatokal 10:50, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Because if you read a Japanese map it says "Toukyou wan a-ku-a ra-i-n". 'Tokyo' and 'wan' are written in kanji (Japanese characters) and 'a-ku-a ra-i-n' are in katakana (used for foreign words). So "Tokyo Wan Aqua Line" is almost exactly what the locals call it. —The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
220.147.135.176 (
talk •
contribs) .
Why a Tunnel?
Just curious. Also, it'll help flesh out the article and the "
Bridge-tunnel" article, which lists reasons for all B-T designs except this one. Does anyone know what was the thought process behind selecting a bridge-tunnel design over a high-level bridge or other design? Was it earthquake or other disaster considerations? Cost concerns? Infrastructure problems? The length of the crossing? Aesthetics?—
WhosAsking (
talk) 14:18, 14 August 2008 (UTC)reply
How much time saved?
The article says
The Tokyo Bay Aqua-Line reduced the drive between Chiba and Kanagawa, two important industrial regions, to 15 minutes
Okay, that's great, but how much of a reduction is this? Could someone add how long it took to drive from the opposite points before the Aqua-Line was built?
Unschool 09:04, 2 November 2009 (UTC)reply
About 90 min. Source added.
Jpatokal (
talk) 10:00, 2 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Wow—that was fast. Thanks.
Unschool 10:57, 2 November 2009 (UTC)reply