Editors who violate any listed restrictions may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense.
An editor must be
aware before they can be sanctioned.
With respect to any reverting restrictions:
Edits made solely to enforce any clearly established consensus are exempt from all edit-warring restrictions. In order to be considered "clearly established" the consensus must be proven by prior talk-page discussion.
Edits made which remove or otherwise change any material placed by clearly established consensus, without first obtaining consensus to do so, may be treated in the same manner as clear vandalism.
Clear vandalism of any origin may be reverted without restriction.
Reverts of edits made by anonymous (IP) editors that are not vandalism are exempt from the 1RR but are subject to
the usual rules on edit warring. If you are in doubt, contact an administrator for assistance.
If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. Remember: When in doubt, don't revert!
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all
list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on
terrorism, individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the
discussion and see a list of open tasks.TerrorismWikipedia:WikiProject TerrorismTemplate:WikiProject TerrorismTerrorism articles
It seems like ISIS is more active this year than it was in the previous few years. Looks like they are returning to mid 2010s numbers
2600:1700:B4F0:4C20:DD1D:9BC0:63C7:685A (
talk) 01:45, 23 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Western news media blame ISIS, Russian medias blame Ukrain and USA.
Where are proofs? CNN mentions some "ISIS telegram channel", I tried to find it, to no avail.
Do we have ANY statements from ISIS representatives in video, photo or text form whatsoever?
There are at least 2 terrorists that were caught and they said nothing about ISIS involvement (source: russian telegram channel "SHOOT" has videos with suspects' interrogation)
114.46.98.122 (
talk) 12:34, 23 March 2024 (UTC)reply
So you're saying that "Western media" is not a reliable source but a Russian telegram channel "interrogation" is?
AusLondonder (
talk) 13:47, 23 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Hm, on one side there is Western media without proofs. On other side, there is a video Russian officials interrogating persons that did the attack... I'm not even sure who to trust...
114.46.98.122 (
talk) 00:27, 24 March 2024 (UTC)reply
The perpetrators are unknown so far. We could add this to the list on the basis that ISIS is suspected, but I'd rather wait for a confirmation. You are free to add it yourself if you want.
Chomik! (
talk?) 19:23, 23 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Like I said it was on telegram, so I may not be able to provide a direct source. But i do have a photo from official ISIL media (which I cannot send). But there is a 99.999999999% chance it was them.
TheLibyanGuy (
talk) 19:28, 23 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Okay, I added it to the list. Thank you!
Chomik! (
talk?) 19:47, 23 June 2024 (UTC)reply
No problem. But please note that due to the ongoing attacks, information related to the attacks are subject to change.
TheLibyanGuy (
talk) 19:51, 23 June 2024 (UTC)reply