This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Arts and Entertainment This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group. Latter Day Saint movement This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mormonism and the Latter Day Saint movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latter Day Saint movementWikipedia:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementTemplate:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementLatter Day Saint movement articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Women writers Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Ireland Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. An image is requested for this article as its inclusion will substantially increase the significance of the article. Please remove the image-needed parameter once the image is added. Women's History Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Journalism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Education Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Women in Religion Low‑importance This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Women in Red: Women writers & their works (2019) This article was created or improved during the Women writers & their works edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Red project in September 2019. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles

I launched this article as I believed that the subject’s 14 years editing an active magazine, leading a team, and debating a wide range of topics, followed by over 20 years running creative retreats at the third busiest centre for such things in Ireland, were sufficient for notability. I certainly see thousands of less notable people in the encyclopaedia, and I made sure to cite all major points. But another editor has raised a query, so did I miss something? Thanks for any inputs. Twilson r ( talk) 18:02, 3 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Twilson r, notability is a function of the amount of coverage available in reliable sources (see WP:GNG for the main guideline). I wasn't able to pull up the offline sources, but between the citation information and the claims that they are backing up in the article, this seems like an article cobbled together from brief mentions and primary sources. Sources 1-6, 17 and 18 are mere mentions, sources 10-16, 23 and 24 are primary sources. Sources 20-22 may have some coverage, but they are primarily about the Anam Cara Writer's and Artist's Retreat––if this is the only significant coverage in a reliable source, then it's better to redirect to that article. This leaves sources 7-9, which are all about the same court case and it's unclear how much coverage they have about the subject beyond the court proceedings (especially considering that Booth-Forbes had not yet begun her career at the time). _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:16, 3 September was 2019 (UTC)

Rosguill, I must start by saying thanks for answering so quickly, and personally. I am sorry if the article looks “cobbled together” as I wove it over some time, and started by seeking secondary sources, while of course drawing on primary too. I added the legal case late, and would describe it as a secondary point. I would consider the more than 25 years of magazine work, nearly 14 as editor, as one major ground, and the directorship of the retreat as the other. I think I need to support the Exponent II aspect better, if I understand correctly, and will work on that. Twilson r ( talk) 18:25, 3 September 2019 (UTC) reply