Roberta Maley was nominated for
deletion.
The discussion was closed on 25 April 2010 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were
merged into
Spotify. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see
its history; for its talk page, see
here.
Despotify was nominated for
deletion.
The discussion was closed on 20 March 2009 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were
merged into
Spotify. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see
its history; for its talk page, see
here.
Text and/or other creative content from [[
Roberta Maley]] was copied or moved into [[
Spotify#Staff]] with [permanent diff this edit]. The former page's [ history] now serves to
provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Podcasting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of notable
podcasts and
podcast-related information on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PodcastingWikipedia:WikiProject PodcastingTemplate:WikiProject Podcastingpodcasting articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Professional sound production, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
sound recording and reproduction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Professional sound productionWikipedia:WikiProject Professional sound productionTemplate:WikiProject Professional sound productionProfessional sound production articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
apps on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AppsWikipedia:WikiProject AppsTemplate:WikiProject Appsapps articles
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
[[World Economic Forum#Technology Pioneers Programme|Technology Pioneer]] The anchor (#Technology Pioneers Programme) has been
deleted by other users before.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors
Merger proposal
I propose merging
Criticism of Spotify into
Spotify. "Criticism of Spotify" is arguably
biased, and the merger is supported by the fact that
WP:CRITS states "Articles dedicated to controversies about a topic are generally discouraged".
Tbf69 14:58, 25 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Oppose, there is signficant coverage of criticism against Spotify, and though the article may contain biased language, it can be cleaned up without resorting to an unnecessary merge.
Theknine2 (
talk) 18:44, 29 January 2023 (UTC)reply
WP:CRITS - "Articles dedicated to controversies about a topic are generally discouraged" --
Tbf69 12:56, 30 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Support per
WP:CRITS and the fact that splitting articles is generally not a great strategy.
Popcornfud (
talk) 18:54, 29 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Oppose article has enough media coverage to keep it separate.
War Wounded (
talk) 12:38, 30 January 2023 (UTC)reply
WP:CRITS - "Articles dedicated to controversies about a topic are generally discouraged" --
Tbf69 12:55, 30 January 2023 (UTC)reply
We can refer to
WP:CORG, though. Adding the content of the spin-off into the main article would extend it substantially and thus put undue weight on the "Reception" section, which would also be overwhelmed with content pertaining to criticisms. Keeping it as a separate article with careful wording could be an easier way to achieve
WP:NPOV in regards to the critiques leveled against the company.
ASpacemanFalls (
talk) 14:51, 30 January 2023 (UTC)reply
I'm fairly sure controversy sections within articles are even more reviled, as @
ASpacemanFalls hinted. Crusader1096 (
message) 15:17, 12 February 2023 (UTC)reply
"Reviled"? They seem a standard WP feature, and a natural counterpart to an Accolades section. It's all part of a subject's history. This may be a long shot (and I pre-apologize if I'm being
out of left field), but could some general aversion to disapproval be in play here? –
AndyFielding (
talk) 09:39, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Generally, "controversy" sections should be avoided. See
WP:CRITS.
Popcornfud (
talk) 11:24, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Intro addition
@
Wobuaichifan: I think your addition has merit, but wouldn't say it belongs in the intro. The criticism is extensively covered down in the article, so it may be better to add the bit about artists who support Spotify's model there, perhaps even extended with some quotes and prominent examples. For the intro, though, it's not essential to mention, I'd say. What do you think?
ASpacemanFalls (
talk) 08:57, 5 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected edit request on 2 February 2024
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
I am very familiar with artist Paul Byrum and have noticed that many songs from Celtic Thunder no longer have his original voice. They have been re-recorded with another voice AND still list Mr. Byrom as the recording artist. Very disappointed that such a large company mishandled the recording artist and carries inaccurate documentation of artist. If I can tell the difference of this one artist, how many others are being mislead and misrepresented in the same manner??
Drbethus (
talk) 11:27, 29 May 2024 (UTC)reply