Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on
Phabricator and on
MediaWiki.org.
This article is written in
Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that research on Inuit clothing began with detailed images of Inuit people produced by Europeans as early as the 1560s?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alaska, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
U.S. state of Alaska on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AlaskaWikipedia:WikiProject AlaskaTemplate:WikiProject AlaskaAlaska articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arctic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Arctic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArcticWikipedia:WikiProject ArcticTemplate:WikiProject ArcticArctic articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greenland, a
WikiProject related to the nation of Greenland. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.GreenlandWikipedia:WikiProject GreenlandTemplate:WikiProject GreenlandGreenland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Native Americans,
Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related
indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the Americas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Indigenous peoples of the Americas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of the AmericasWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasIndigenous peoples of the Americas articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to
ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have
fair use rationales): No issues. b (appropriate use with
suitable captions): Mostly fine, but see below.
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·
Image notes:
The images themselves are good, but I might want to recommend moving some around. The lead has no images, while two of those currently in the article chop up sections a little. Right now, I'm inclined to suggest moving
File:Inuk Woman (6819810943).jpg to the lead, as it's a nice, eye-catching image that's currently a bit awkwardly placed halfway through a section break.
Vaticidalprophet 09:20, 26 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Putting this and my other current review on 2O because I am clearly somewhere between grudgingly tolerated and actively unwanted on Wikipedia, and I should at least clear my head a bit and drop current obligations.
Vaticidalprophet 10:19, 27 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Hiya :). I'll be giving a second opinion / finish the review. (opt) means I don't consider it part of the GA criteria. Article looks good!
FemkeMilene (
talk) 07:32, 15 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Hi Femkemilene, thanks for jumping in on this one. I've made alterations below or explained my rationale otherwise. ♠
PMC♠
(talk) 20:59, 15 May 2021 (UTC)reply
I'll do the honours. Thanks for picking this up.
Vaticidalprophet 10:11, 16 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Prose:
Consider splitting the lede in two for ease of reading
Done
'Analysis of effectiveness' is not a scientific field. Would natural sciences work? Physics is too specific I assume.
I cheated by retitling the section "Modern scientific research" - does that work?
Another significant area of research on Inuit skin clothing has been its effectiveness, especially as contrasted with modern winter clothing made from synthetic materials. Despite significant -> twice the word significant. Can either be replaced by a synonym?
Swapped #2 for "extensive"
Accessibility
Provide alt for images (opt)
Done
Maybe use the {{lang}} template for the bit of Danish(?) to help screen readers (opt)
Done
Source
Spot checked four sentences, arguably one minor discrepancy:
is the most efficient system for preventing heat transfer from the face in the cold, windy environment of the Arctic. The source says: 'developed to date'. As you could theoretically have some sort of exhaustive algorithm (with infinite computing time) that checks all possible configurations of clothing, I think it'd better to specify.
Arguably, that's kind of implied in the statement that it's the most efficient. If something else was found to be better, the fur ruff would no longer be the most efficient.
Other:
No close paraphrasing in the sources I checked, earwig is happy
Stable, neutral and broad .
Did you know nomination
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
... that research on Inuit clothing began with detailed images of Inuit people produced by Europeans as early as the 1560s? Source: King, J.C.H. (2005).
"Preface and Introduction". In King, J.C.H.; Pauksztat, Birgit; Storrie, Robert (eds.). Arctic Clothing. Montreal: McGill-Queen's Press. p. 16.
ISBN978-0-7735-3008-9.
Improved to Good Article status by
Premeditated Chaos (
talk). Self-nominated at 16:07, 16 May 2021 (UTC).reply
Article was nominated within 7 days of passing GA. Article is well-written and cited with reliable sources. QPQ has been completed. No pings on Earwigs for copyvio or close paraphrasing. Hook is interesting, cited, and short enough for DYK.
Morgan695 (
talk) 21:50, 18 May 2021 (UTC)reply