Python (Busch Gardens Tampa Bay) has been listed as one of the
Sports and recreation good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: September 1, 2020. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Python (Busch Gardens Tampa Bay) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Python (Busch Gardens Tampa Bay) appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 22 September 2020 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Anybody posting rumors of what might be replacing Python, DON'T. Please keep the article neutral and rumor-free.
Also, the claim made by the Serengeti Express commentators seem like weasel words and ad libs. It is not verifiable and keep this out of any of the pages until there has been an official word from the park.
Bgtbbum 21:37, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: HickoryOughtShirt?4 ( talk · contribs) 19:29, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
The general manager of Busch Gardens Tampa, William Thurman, expected the approval for the expansion was anticipated due to the recent success seen at the park in October 1975seems oddly worded. What is specifically tripping me up is
expected the approval for the expansion was anticipated
she expressed "feeling a little unsteady on [her] feet but exhilarated."?
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 06:17, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Adog ( talk). Self-nominated at 00:25, 2 September 2020 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: Nothing specifically wrong per se, but in the original hook, I would recommend linking "inversion" (and also removing the Florida link per MOS:OVERLINK). epicgenius ( talk) 18:48, 2 September 2020 (UTC)