This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
An image used in this article,
File:REAGANWH.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:REAGANWH.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 11:33, 13 April 2012 (UTC) |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of Presidents of the United States by judicial appointments. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:14, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:List of Vice Presidents of the United States which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 23:02, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
In retrospect, I agree with the IP who initially reverted the addition that we need to discuss the matter before adding a column for number of weeks the appointing president was in office. BD2412 T 22:55, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
I personally don’t like the weeks column, and I agree that it needs to be discussed here before being implemented. I think at most there could be a number of terms column. But I’ve never seen any article anywhere discussing presidents by number of weeks in office. Dlambe3 ( talk) 08:17, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Hey there, thanks for opening the discussion. When I checked and didn't see any previous discussion of this kind of thing, I considered starting a talk section but then figured this fell under WP:BOLD, and (per that page) if folks didn't like it they could revert it and kick it to the talk page. And so here we are! I see two main questions at hand here, I'll give my thoughts on both, glad to hear what others think.
In short: I think time in office is an important piece of context to have alongside things like number of judicial appointments, since time in office varies quite a bit, and is directly related to opportunity to make appointments. I don't particularly care how it's expressed, weeks just seemed a happy medium to me. The Human Spellchecker ( talk) 04:58, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
This article makes mention of 677 Article III federal district court judgeships. However, I have also seen the number 678 passed around. And the article that actually details the U.S. federal district court sizes (excluding the Article IV ones) adds up to 678. Also, this source from the "United States district court" article:
Which one is it? And why the discrepancy? 173.63.14.128 ( talk) 09:18, 9 June 2021 (UTC)