This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Due to the overwhelming occurances of "rickrolls" including the Family Guy rickroll, I think this deserves a place on the list, if it was on there but I overlooked it, I appologize. PvtDonut 71.112.192.153 04:44, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Is there anything on the im in ur or im in your cats anywhere? - Ritarri 14:11, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
I believe The >:3 "JESUS CHRIST IT'S A LION GET IN THE CAR" and Longcat memes deserve mention on this page, as both are prevalent internationally in many sites and a simple Google search (69k for longcat and 8k for the LION (whih doesn't include the ">:3" moniker) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.199.8.185 ( talk) 15:51, 9 March 2007 (UTC).
...are you a moron or what? Ask ANYBODY who uses the internet. Jesus christ, how can there be the slightest doubt as to Longcat's status as a meme? 86.76.6.127 10:18, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
'Meme' is not interchangeable with 'fad'.
I don't really consider these fads as good examples of memes. Yes technically they are memes, but only moderately successful ones. EG. A term like "google it" is far far more successful, but obviously wouldn't be suited to this page since you wouldn't call it a fad. This page actually covers very specific fads that are only successful within small groups (relative to the size of the net). I suggest renaming to "Biggest Internet Fads" or some other phrase that doesn't use the word 'meme'. I'm not sure how meme terminology got on here in the first place. Xep 05:55, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
I just wanted to add my opinion--if Richard Dawkins saw this use of meme, he'd roll in his grave. If he were dead. We're using the word meme to justify a list of fads, seriously. And that's just not cool. Somercy 00:01, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
I'm mystified why this was removed. I realize that Wikipedia has concerns over potential defamation ( WP:BLP), but the primary source here is very solid: a state-run online offender registry. There is no reasonable doubt that Peppers does indeed exist, that he is indeed an Internet phenomenon, and that he was indeed convicted of a sexual offense. Perhaps the existence of this phenomenon regarding a physically deformed man is juvenile and/or morally offensive. Nonetheless, under WP:NPOV, it is not our job as an encyclopedia to make such judgments. Our job is to report verifiable facts.
If someone wants to remove this verifiable, sourced material on grounds of WP:BLP or any other policy, please provide a specific citation of the policy language in question. Crotalus horridus ( TALK • CONTRIBS) 03:16, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
The O rly owl is a notable contribution as is the goatse.cx shock site. I don't see why these shouldn't be included. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Seraphim Whipp ( talk • contribs) 17:14, 15 March 2007 (UTC).
I have come back to this article to find it's still quite bare. To quote you ( Chris) from Talk:List_of_Internet_phenomena#Sourcing:
Therefore, why were my edits so contested in the first place? Both of my additions had their own wikipedia articles. Rather than continually removing them, you could have looked for some sources yourself rather than slamming me for trying to improve the article. My edits did not require a leap of faith.
I think this article needs to change drastically. If someone adds a well known internet phenomena and it is well known, then it should be left, with a note under the addition, asking someone to find a source for it. It seems utterly ridiculous that this article has been smashed to pieces simply because people would rather remove well known memes and phenomenas, rather than finding sources themselves.
Seraphim Whipp 13:44, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
O RLY? sources: nassau county talking about orly - [2], I would then point to the sources on the O RLY? page already. I believe there is already plenty of sources for the o rly owl. SelfStudyBuddy 20:10, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
This is a pretty big internet phenomenon. I think it deserves a spot. There are currently over 500 similar pictures produced in response to the original (which can be found at http://icanhascheezburger.files.wordpress.com/2007/01/i-can-has-cheezburger.jpg ). Many of the other pictures can be found at http://icanhascheezburger.com/, a website that was spawned as a result of the phenomenon.
The same could be said about any internet phenomenon. That's the thing about them, they aren't really that awesome, but they just catch on. The "happycat" as it is known on the "internets" appears in many many places and is truly an internet phenomenon. I reference: www.cafepress.com/happycat http://wiki.ytmnd.com/Happycat http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Happycat&defid=1406003 http://web.archive.org/web/20031018065704/http://www.happycat.ru/ http://icanhascheezburger.com/(entirely inspired by happycat) http://www.myspace.com/icanhascheezburger http://images.google.ca/images?hl=en&q=happycat&btnG=Google+Search&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&um=1&sa=N&tab=wi
...I'd say more than just a funny picture of a cat accompanied by Engrish...
The list is only for phenomina which have obtained a mention outside of the internet too. That said, Wired News has picked it up. [3] It's borderline, perhaps we should wait and see what happens? -- h2g2bob ( talk) 03:01, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
PORN. Come on, how could anyone forget this video? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.115.4.5 ( talk) 19:00, 5 May 2007 (UTC).
what happened the original list of meme's in the internet meme page that was forwarded/combined to internet phenomena page?
the current grouping of information on this page is a joke compared to the former list on the internet meme page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Brekk ( talk • contribs) 06:26, 6 May 2007 (UTC).
This should REALLY be added here, but I can't find any media sources mentioning him. Anyone care to help? Bravemuta 12:49, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
Done. I managed to find a Washington Post article through Lexis Nexis that called it an Internet phenomenon :D --- RockMFR 17:44, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Why does this redirect here, yet there's no mention of him? Tarc 18:20, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
This one is certainly notable; it has been mentioned numerous times on atheist websites and it's a well-known religious parallel. Should be worth including.-- Orthologist 16:02, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
theres like 10 freakin memes now, there used to be like 100. man, come on, put them back, they were awesome. this is wikipedia not crappypedia, add the awesome back.
I don't see why Longcat keeps getting removed from this list. First, he wasn't notable enough to warrant his own article, which is true, so it was suggested it would be moved to a list such as this. Now it keeps getting baleeted, while things like Limecat stay. Longcat is much more prevalent than Limecat, so I don't see why one stays while the other gets baleeted. -- Lakerdonald 21:50, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Longcat is not only long, but notable too. An entire (flame)war was fought over Longcat as the Anonymous Legion (4chan) vs. Subeta. Link related:
http://www.spifftastic.net/239#more-239 --
71.57.243.203 04:44, 7 June 2007 (UTC) desu
The 300 fad was started on Newgrounds, in the topic named "photoshop Leonidas" where the first post contained the original image. As you can imagine a lot were there... I actually considered doing an AoM related one, but needed an image editing program. There are some on the chan sites too, mention them(such as shoop da woop, which i don't understand)
I can't judge where 300 became a fad originally, as it has been years since I've frequented Newgrounds. I can say that it has a tremendous, or rather EPIC display on 4chan. To the point, I remember 300 based lines as "Hey guys, where are we dining tonight?" and "Hello? Hell's Diner? I need reservations for 299!" Some may call it madness or blasphemy, but I say "This.. Is.. A Meme!" Also, "Shoop da woop" is the sound made when one is a chargin' their lazers, which is its own meme inside of the chans, but I can't say I've seen it outside of there. -- 71.57.243.203 05:26, 7 June 2007 (UTC) desu
And a few others among it, I would rate Badger high above a few other things on this list (notably the bands) In terms of Internet Phenomena. In addition both Something Awful and 4chan are responsible for a good deal of todays current internet phenomena, or more so play a part. Either way I am curious why Badger Badger is not listed, even with a neutral POV who here can argue you haven't seen it. It is the problem with internet phenomena and an underground or silent movement is there isn't much press.
Do prank calls on live television constitute "noticable", or is Girltalk's late night figures too "low brow?" Dr. R.KZ 07:51 AM 12th April
"The American equivalent to 2chan, it has been a large source of internet phenomenon since it's inception in 2003, such as Caturday and the O Rly? owl." That should be "since its inception" without the '.
While the term came from Something Awful, the image did come from 4chan, where the word "repost" was filtered to "owl," prompting a user to create the macro. ( 24.16.122.180 23:12, 11 June 2007 (UTC))
It was on top 100 Google videos for 8 months! 9 Million views on one of the copies alone. Yes, bit old now.. but it broke my heart when its entry was removed from Wiki. -- Flayed 06:41, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
{{ editprotected}}
The following diffs to be backed out:
Just wondering, is it/would it classify? - Jigsy 19:34, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Madness Combat not only caps ten million views on Newgrounds, but has also spawned many many tributes. While it currently doesn't have any secondary sources, and thus can't have an article, it would be nice to see it mentioned here.
Seriously, I think this meme should be on here.
I agree with that one. Its power level, I mean, its views on YouTube are over 1.5 million! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBtpyeLxVkI -- 71.57.243.203 04:55, 7 June 2007 (UTC) desu
I agree, it's quickly spread across the net as one of the most recognized phrases, possibly even surpassing the likes of "All your base are belong to us". 67.49.43.98 09:06, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Especially LUE board.
Cheers.
Ins't Wikipedia one of the most notable internet phenomena of all?
I lawld. Agreed. -- SelfStudyBuddy 21:55, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
This article upsets me. There are so many other Internet memes that should be placed here. Besides, how does one thing like 2channel qualify for an Internet phenomenon while sites like SomethingAwful and 4chan are not listed? -- Jeff Bongi 04:26, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=List_of_Internet_phenomena&diff=111292583&oldid=111268243
Thanks to an anonymous' edit, this list has no value. -- nlitement [talk] 19:24, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
"distributed through video sharing sites like YouTube,"
The "Star Wars Kid" appeared on the internet in 2003, and YouTube started in 2006, yet the article is written as if YouTube helped to spread the video when clearly it had already been famous for years.
Clown666 16:42, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
This has to make it. He and his video "Impossible is Nothing" spawned an uproar covered by many real media outlets, including the New York Times. A true meme if ever there was one.
The italicized sourced text was blanked yesterday. It is not proper to blank sourced text, so please restore it promptly--thanks!
Can someone please tell me how this article is relevant to an encyclopedia? 24.224.212.191 18:18, 11 July 2007 (UTC)crazyreader
Should the David Elsewhere popping and liquid dancing video be mentioned? Valerius Myotis 05:49, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
No, i think he's mentioned elsewhere...
He's also pretty popular, why wont someone add him? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.153.6.196 ( talk)
Mentos & Diet Coke eruptions is listed as an Internet phenomenon in it's own Wikipedia article, as well as in a Houston Chronicle article [12] but is not mentioned here. Dubkiller 09:58, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
Does the content really reproduce itself in the same way as a virus? I thought people simply sent the content to friends, and so it gets replicated, or more often just a hyperlink gets replicated. I don't know enough meme-theory to be able to rephrase that in a way that makes sense both to a specialist and a layperson. Any suggestions? -- Davémon 08:18, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
should be added DragonDance 03:02, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
No, they shouldn't. They are limited to the chans.
I wonder if something about Crazy Frog should be included here. It originally started as an MP3 of someone impersonating a two stroke engine and spread virally across the internet before being animated, and eventually becoming the Crazy Frog we all know and hate. -- Darksun 17:40, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
I think 300 with Leonidas is quickly becoming an Internet phenomena. I'm seeing a lot of pictures with him in it S:
300 has been an internet phenomenon, just not good enough for Wikipedia. The Conundrumer T C 19:56, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
I have just experienced an incredibly annoying half-hour, trying to discover what is "Chocolate Rain".
Unfortunately, in the Wiki community, everyone seems more concerned with sourcing the term than in explaining it. Ditto with the moronic debate as to whether it deserves its own entry or not.
I would think such considerations are way secondary to the primary goal of explaining and/or defining a term. However, some people seem to think that if there's no source, then it should not exist—and to bad for the shmucks like me who'd just like a concise explanation of a term that is percolating in the zeitgeist.
So, to the community at large, I am asking—pretty-please—with sugar on top—can someone please just tell me what "Chocolate Rain" is? Thank you. -- TallulahBelle 01:17, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
All "featured videos" were Chocolate Rain on YouTube once, guess that's why it's become a meme. -- nlitement [talk] 07:17, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Well, we currently have a source for Chocolate Rain that I posted above. If someone could write a quick blurb about about it, it can be mentioned on this page. I suggest something like this:
"Chocolate Rain - A song by 25-year old Minneapolis resident Tay Zonday, posted on YouTube. His deep voice makes the song sound like it is sung by a much older man. This coupled with the catchy lyrics of the song and captions explaining that Zonday moves away from the mic to breathe in has led this video garnered over 3 million views after 3 months. It has also led to a large number of remixes and spin-offs."
Also, I found another source for Chocolate Rain, this one here:
http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2007350800,00.html
Work on the blurb, so we can finally get something about this on Wikipedia. --
GhostStalker(
Got a present for ya! |
Mission Log) 14:08, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
(undent) So yeah. I added it. the_undertow talk 07:24, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Any agreement on removing youtube and other hit counts from all items on this list, whether or not the count is accurate or sourced? The problems we're having are:
For all these reasons I think these numbers cause more problems than they solve. So I plan to delete them in a few days. Any thoughts, objections, agreement, etc? Wikidemo 02:48, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
While Youtube and Myspace are popular websites, I don't feel they can be classified as an Internet Meme. If Popularity = Meme, then Wikipedia is also a meme, as well as google, and 100,000 other webpages. I submit that Youtube and Myspace should be removed as memes. Engunneer 23:29, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
YouTUBE VIDEO should be noted as meme
First. It's a gif. Second. It's not from youtube. It was another one of those 4chan memes on the internet.
It's not from 4chan, my friend runs a website where people submit original .gifs to be put in a gallery, 4chan tends to claim responsibility for memes that they didn't create.
-- 209.189.130.17 20:19, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
what does your friends website have to do with anything? dont post useless comments with nothing to back it up, —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.212.33.252 ( talk) 07:18, August 25, 2007 (UTC)
Itjustsomerandomguy i feel has become an internet phenomenon. He has already quickly become one of the most subscribed people on Youtube with his Marvel/DC videos of which he has 17. He has also even been recognized by Marvel and been interviewed on their website. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.131.249.137 ( talk • contribs) 86.131.249.137.
Sign your post and provide some reference links and it might just qualify.-- Oni Ookami Alfador Talk| @ 18:15, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
ok. im not good with the whole wikipedia editing thing but there is SOOOO much missing from this article such as "you kicked my dog" end of ze world" "you are a pirate" and heaps more. it would be such a large project to list every one so i think it would be a really good idea if someone could include a list of websites that internet phenonemas have spawned from or gained popularity through (e.g. albinoblacksheep and newsgrounds )
220.233.208.111 11:35, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
-- 210.87.15.130 14:16, 20 August 2007 (UTC) Agree. And when this article is unlocked for editing, someone MUST print "Nice shemale pics" ref:( http://www.serboard.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=7285&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0) If anything it shows how quickly meme's are spread across user forums and the Internet.
I'm also putting in a nomination for "The internet is a series of tubes!" —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 210.87.15.130 ( talk) 14:16, August 20, 2007 (UTC)
Would WikiScanner count, it went online on the 14th and within two days, it was on the national news! Henceruns4554 19:46, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
When I searched for happy slip, it redirected me to this page. I expected to find some information here, but there is none. Is it normal to be redirected somewhere for a search term but not find it on the destination page?
68.251.43.2 22:38, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
I just couldn't find enough references to prove it, but Charlie the Unicorn goes to Candy Mountain is a huge sensation amongst kids and even young adults. When I want to "return the favor" for someone making me watch a different internet meme, i "thank" them by referring them to this video, and usually they say their kid walks in and goes "Oh yeah, Charlie the Unicorn". I've met several people that can quote most lines and there are even youtube videos of people re-enacting the video themselves line for line. Annoying video that gets stuck in your head is here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q5im0Ssyyus —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sadchild ( talk • contribs) 17:18, August 23, 2007 (UTC).
Oh yeah! We forgot about Charlie!
We need to find some references. Astro 15:17, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
I think this should be enough http://www.google.com/search?q=charlie+goes+to+candy+mountain&rls=com.microsoft:*&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&startIndex=&startPage=1
Astro 15:19, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
Badger Badger Badger seems like it should make this list.
I believe there should be a general category of websites such was eBaumsworld, Albino Black Sheep, ytmnd, Weeblstuff, jibjab, Homestarrunner, newgrounds, etc
It has been discussed before, about Chocolate Rain's notability. Several people already suggested including it in this article, but instead it was deleted due to not being notable enough. Now, it's literally dominating Youtube. Today is Tay Zonday Day [13], and Chocolate Rain is all over the frontpage of Youtube. Is that noticeable enough? The Conundrumer T C 01:07, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Okay, never mind. It seems Youtube really was hacked, since there's no trace of Tay Zonday Day in their blog, even though the original Chocolate Rain is still featured. I guess it can wait. The Conundrumer T C 12:34, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
yeah the video is a meme at this stage, chocolate rain has received ober 1 million views. I added it. you guys clean it up or whatever. It just has to be there.
That was me. I put it under Internet meme because thats where it redirects. Its ridiculous that 'chocolate rain' is not covered anywhere in wikipedia.
I don't understand why you consider a meme with 143,000 google hits 'not notable' just because a newspaper hasn't covered it. Most net memes, even the most popular, never will.
In most cases its not even realistic to expect a memeto be backed by 'reputable sources'? Its an internet phenomenon in the first place. It owes its entire existence to blogs, youtube and myspace.
Insisting a youtube/myspace phenomenon be documented somewhere other than runaway popularity on youtube/myspace is overly stringent standard for internet memes. They're defined by the fact they're prevalent on the internet; popularity on some of the internet's most popular sites (youtube, myspace, etc) are the gold standard to evaluate them by, not the online edition of a print newspaper. Many such memes will generate interest among millions of people without getting mentioned in the mainstream media. Jeffjrstewart
I'll concede the simplest way for me to deal with this is just to play by the rules, and make a case that it's noteworthy with links. But while we're on the topic, I still think the noteworthy standard on wikipedia is far too high for this type of material.
You mention that one can just go straight to youtube to learn about this type of thing, and that people do not go to wikipedia for every last little thing- but as a matter of fact, I often do. I saw chocolate rain on youtube, couldn't make heads or tails of it, and headed straight to wikipedia for an explanation. I wasn't expecting a well-written, impeccably sourced entry, just a brief word or stump, and maybe a couple links to point me in the right direction. But even that wasn't there, and I thought that for the first time in a long time the site had let me down.
It turned out that as a whole, it hadn't. Many people had attempted to make entries, only to have them deleted by a core group that hate such fads and want to keep this site 'respectable'. In fact, the term chocolate rain has now been 'salted', even banning any further attempts at entries! To me thats just crazy.
The main argument seems to be here that if this can go on, then hundreds of other only marginally noteworthy things could go on as well. To this I say, why not? Doubtless, many such articles would likely be poorly sourced and poorly written...but I hardly see how thats really so bad when the alternative is simply to have nothing at all. I fully appreciate and respect the need to have stringent guidelines for wikipedia on serious topics such as biographies of historical figures, scientific phenomena, etc. But I hardly see why entries about memes, big or small, need to meet such high standards. A quick stub and a link or two is fine.
Every month hundreds of wikipedia entries get deleted due to 'noteworthy' guidelines which basically state, 'well, we can't just put EVERYTHING on wikipedia, can we?" But as a matter of fact you can. And there isn't really any logical reason (cost of labor, space, etc) that they can't be.
There seem to be a lot of passionate wikipedians that want the site to be taken seriously as a credible encyclopedia, and see entries on internet fads as harming that credibility. But this medium makes those entries possible, and a lot of people want them. I know I do. As good as the standards are for 'noteworthy' material, when it comes to quick, useful info on minor topics, trying to ape encyclopedia Brittanica in totality is holding the sites full potential back.
Check out this article about noteworthy standards- http://www.slate.com/id/2160222/pagenum/1 Jeffjrstewart
Yeah but chocolate rain made you cross the street the other day.
The logical way to eat soup is with a spoon.
Chocolate Rain should be added to the list, if someone had a problem with it having its own article. This was the case because it was deleted.
How's this for a source?:
http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,22170787-5012327,00.html
If that source is adequate, I guess we can add Chocolate Rain to this list, and ask for the current redirect to be moved from
Internet Meme to here. --
GhostStalker(
Got a present for ya! |
Mission Log) 22:16, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Tay Zonday has been interviewed on G4's Attack of the Show and he was chosen for who's having the best week ever on VH1's Best Week Ever. A Google search for "Tay Zonday" gets 780,000 results and "Chocolate Rain" gets 1,260,000. He's freakin notable already! Herorev 01:41, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
http://www.usatoday.com/life/people/2007-08-28-miss-south-carolina_N.htm
I think this needs to be added to the list. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.34.19.150 ( talk) 04:07, August 30, 2007 (UTC)
Me too 09:12, 4 September 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.50.88.168 ( talk)
I think "Ask a Ninja" is enought popular to be added here. What do you think about it ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.125.162.172 ( talk) 23:17, August 29, 2007 (UTC)
Yep. Askaninja pwns. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.62.100.127 ( talk) 04:05, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Surely caramelldansen classifies as an internet phenomena. - Jigsy 02:49, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Yo gotta add this to the list . —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.224.121.87 ( talk) 02:23, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi there, I think that OK Go's first internet video was "A million ways" where they danced in the backyard of one of the member's house... Not sure about it, but I think that "Here it Goes Again" was done later... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.59.78.99 ( talk) 10:36, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
I forgot... here you can see a source for this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Million_Ways#Music_Video —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.59.78.99 ( talk) 10:39, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
I would like to nominate Yugioh the Abridged Series, an online less than ten minute parody series on the anime and manga series Yugioh, to be listed on this page as an internet phenomuna. Under stastistics, it has been viewed far more than even Boom Goes the Dynamite has on Youtube, and single episodes have been viewed hundreds of thousands of times. It is a series of videos, so it is more than one immensly popular video. It has had a slight influence on Yugioh GX apparently, as I have heard they have been adding more comedy to the show. (An example is one character suggesting a sleepover where they talk about dueling and strategies, while the other look at him stangely) It has become a controversial case on Youtube, so much the creator's account, LittleKuriboh, was deleted. It has inspired many other Abirdged Series for animes, notable Naruto. The creator's Abridged Series website, here, had gained thousands of members within mere days. The home website also sells items portraying lines from the show on it. I think it has gone far beyond the term "notable", and it has definetly recieved enough fame to be mentioned. Artist Formerly Known As Whocares 22:23, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Can some1 explain DESU to me? -- 87.162.209.63 16:36, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
There is a Rozen Maiden character named Suiseiseki who ends all her sentences with "desu", which a polite Japanese copula (the equivalent of "be" in English). It is a popular meme on 4chan. -- Phirazo 17:05, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
This videogame portion of this list is really incomplete without the 50 dkp minus/onxyia does wipe club flash animation from World of Warcraft.
Kelliebellerina 20:53, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
There are many internet phenomena with articles. What are the criteria for choosing some entries over others? Ichormosquito 09:05, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
At the top of the article, it says "Revisions and sourced additions are welcome". Normally, self references should be avoided. I have placed it in a {{ selfref}} template, but is there a good reason to have this? -- Phirazo 03:16, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Where is Maddox? http://maddox.xmission.com/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kojirodensetsu ( talk • contribs) 15:26, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
Maddox isn't an internet meme, he's an oft quoted person. 82.46.190.172 00:43, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
What about the " [14]Mr.Pregnant"? He got pretty popular.
the best source i could find was here...
[<object width="425" height="353"><param name="movie" value=" http://www.youtube.com/v/NIME1PSGNaI"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src=" http://www.youtube.com/v/NIME1PSGNaI" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="353"></embed></object>] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.81.186.19 ( talk) 04:01, 19 September 2007 (UTC)