Per Wikipedia guidelines and the consensus of the
Anime and Manga project and previous lengthy discussion, the use of "filler only", "anime only", or other such labels do not belong here and will be removed on sight if readded. Such labels are primarily of interest only to fans, violate
WP:V and
WP:OR, and are not in keeping with the format and standards established by our other featured episode lists.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
anime,
manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about
television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the
style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all
list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
I’ve always wondered about the English titles, what is the (con)census for them?; when official English titles exist I guess they are used, but before/other than that, are the fansub translations, free translations, or other translations used?
For example, episode 31 is titled “迷子のミランダ” Maigo no Miranda. Previously the English title said “Miranda’s Lost Child” (which rather, as far as I know, should be “ミランダの迷子” Miranda no maigo) and now “Lost Child, Miranda”. If it’s just free translations then a title such as “Miranda the Lost Child” is yet another possibility.
Well, I’m just a bit confused about what’s the rule/census/concensus/norm. A bit of clarity would surely make me grateful.
Kess 20:18, 13 May 2007 (UTC)reply
I would guess that whoever edits the article on any given day is probably either using their own personal translation or a translation from a fansub. It's unfortunate, but this is the case with nearly all series that aren't officially licensed or necessarily "reliably" translated. That said, getting the "gist" of the name is more important, rather than worrying about phrasing or synonyms or making a more elegant translation. I would personally translate that as, "The Lost Child, Miranda," but it doesn't really matter, because it means the same thing as, "Miranda, the Lost Child."
WtW-Suzaku 11:06, 2 December 2007 (UTC)reply
Who the hell put bye bye Suman on episode 55
This has nothing to do with the description of the episode and should be removed immediately. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
75.36.239.224 (
talk) 03:18, 6 November 2007 (UTC)reply
Seasons?
Should I (or someone) split the episodes into seasons? I know the anime hasn't been going on for very long, but still, scrolling down 72 episodes with no real form of categorization whatsoever is an eye killer, and the episode list is only going to get longer. I don't mean splitting the episode page into multiple separate pages like
Bleach has done; just doing something like, for example,
The Prince of Tennis or
Blood+ would be fine.
Just a thought--
Erynne Lasgalen (
talk) 02:30, 13 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Is an official source for season divisions available? If so, sounds like a good idea to me.
AnmaFinotera (
talk) 07:16, 26 April 2008 (UTC)reply
I don't know of any official source, but I think the easiest way to divide the episodes is by opening theme song (e.g. the Blood+ episode list). That way there'll be three chunks of 20-something episodes each, as well as the ongoing section.
Erynne Lasgalen (
talk) 04:20, 1 May 2008 (UTC)reply
I'm realizing that a few of these episodes are a bit unclear and confusing. At least for me. Especially episode 69 "Invasion", for some reason. It took several tries for me to understand that one. It could be me. I notice a few of them make tense changes.
itzjustdrama still new to this (
talk) 19:53, 9 April 2008 (UTC)reply
I'm working on gradually correcting the episode summaries--mainly on improving content relevance, correcting tense shifts, correcting basic spelling/grammar, and deleting random opinions. It's mainly a matter of keeping it a summary and not making it a blow-by-blow account of the episode.
Erynne Lasgalen (
talk) 04:59, 19 April 2008 (UTC)reply
Correspondent Manga Chapter
Who took away that thing that informed us of wether an episode was filler (original plot) or canon (telling us what the corresponding manga chapter was) and why? —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
85.241.163.185 (
talk) 20:54, 8 May 2008 (UTC)reply
I can't see why it shouldn't be here, but anyway, can someone tell me where I might be able to find that info? —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
85.241.173.40 (
talk) 21:41, 9 May 2008 (UTC)reply
We don't put that kind of information in anime episode/chapter articles other than giving a general overview in the introduction if it is not based on the entire body of work. Might check fansites, or ask in an anime forum.
AnmaFinotera (
talk) 00:07, 10 May 2008 (UTC)reply
but could to put one page, for example: "what chapters did this episodes cover?", something like that. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Mystictapion (
talk •
contribs) 18:15, 23 May 2008 (UTC)reply
I think the list is too long. If two pages, we can add more information.--
Frontier95 (
talk) 06:33, 29 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Is it too long? Yes, and it should probably be split, as appropriate, once a final episode sound is known, and an appropriate way of splitting the list determined. Will splitting mean you can add more information? No. The plot summaries are already pushing their limits, and splitting it will not give free reign to make them longer. The only thing splitting will do is make the list more manageable in terms of page size/length.
AnmaFinotera (
talk) 13:00, 14 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Maybe, we can seperate them to series. As you know, from Episode 52 is the second series. --
Frontier95 (
talk) 04:33, 30 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Is that where the DVD start being called 2nd Stage? That seems to be our best bet, at the moment. But I don't believe it's the most important issue in the D.Gray-man series of articles or on this page itself. But I guess it would be okay.
Itzjustdrama(
drama?) 04:39, 30 August 2008 (UTC)reply
First, I erased the freaking long description of before, well if you want cleaning take off that meaningless info about the openings and endings, that really isn't supposed to be here, it's already at its respective section.
Second, I added again the manga chapters which where originally added by me, it's really insultive taking off my aport, that took me ages watching every single episode and checking every chapter, so I wrote it all again and added the missing manga chapter tags to the recent chapters, even the one aired yesterday.
Please don't erase it, it's helpful information and It doesn't take too much space. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
190.77.225.72 (
talk) 03:07, 22 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Sorry, but no. Its been undone as you are wrong on both accounts. Its already been discussed above. The themes info does belong here, as you can see if you look at any featured episode list. It is part of any proper episode list, and I've left you a warning for removing it. And no, it is not in its "respective section" it is here and here alone. The manga chapters do not belong in the episode list at all, again as you will see if you look at our featured list. This is the consensus of the anime and manga project here and many featured lists. Wikipedia is not the place for your original research. Do not readd it as you will just continue to be wasting effort as it will continue to be removed. It does not belong here, period. --
AnmaFinotera (
talk·contribs) 03:10, 22 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Well, seems that please and thanks doesn't work anymore .__.
Then, summaries aren't original research too? none of those are official, they're written by people who watch, they're anything but short as the tag says really. I'm not doing a manga chapter list, I ADDED IT RELATING the anime episode at the respective source, which can be more accurate than a summary, a person can check the number and then check the original source.
It's not a thing of belongs or not, the info you put must be helpful for someone. Well, airdates are helpful? they were just copied and pasted from other sources and don't make a particular difference.
The opening and ending info format is wrong, works better as a LIST, more intuitive. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
190.77.225.72 (
talk) 03:25, 22 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Please and thanks do not work when you are asking for improper actions to be allowed. And no, plot summaries are not original research, so long as they are simple basic plot summaries. They are unspokenly sourced to the manga volumes. The attempts to stick which manga chapter an episode is based on does not belong in the table at all. Besides being your own self-admitted research, it is irrelevant and trivial. It being based on the manga is covered in the lead, and that's all. We don't go into minute detail about every episode. Helpful is not really a criteria we use for such things. If you want such a list, go to a fansite, as noted above. The episode list is in its proper format. We are not a fansite nor an in-depth guide to the series. We are an encyclopedia. Airdates are part of its real-world aspects, and it belongs here as part of that. The opening and ending info format is not wrong, it is properly done in prose as per our editing guidelines. --
AnmaFinotera (
talk·contribs) 03:31, 22 May 2008 (UTC)reply
The Twins
Okay, there has been many edits to this article over the names of the Noah Twins. According to Viz Media, it is actually Jasdevi and David actually. You and I may disagree with the company, but until they say otherwise, that is that.
itzjustdrama (
talk) 00:06, 29 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Can you source that? If you have issues with David, that's something about translation. I'm guessing that is in fact your point, but I'm more worried about you calling Jasdero Jasdevi, since that's the name of em combined and not of one of the twins. --
MooNFisH (
talk) 16:28, 29 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Nobody seems to have a problem with what Jasdero is called. I meant that they are collectively Jasdevi and one is David, sorry if that was unclear. How would I source?
itzjustdrama (
talk) 18:57, 29 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Y'know what? I went over the
Wikipedia:Manual of Style (anime- and manga-related articles). And it says, Characters should be identified by their most commonly known name, as per Wikipedia's naming conventions. This may not necessarily be the same as the official name(s). Following that, maybe we should go either Devit or Debitto, making them either Jasdevi or Jasdebi collectively. And them mention VIZ translation underneath.
itzjustdrama (
talk) 20:01, 29 May 2008 (UTC)reply
For sourcing, pointing to a volume of the manga (perhaps even a specific page) where the name comes up should suffice. Regarding which name to use, I would say use Viz's translation, because that's what the person who picks up the manga in a retail store would see, but that's only my interpretation of the MOS. (Admittedly, I don't really care anymore.) —tc 20:09, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Okay then. Lemme go fix all that up. Honestly, I'm tired of it too.
itzjustdrama (
talk) 20:44, 29 May 2008 (UTC)reply
DVDs?
Am I right in thinking DVD information is usually placed on a page like this? I found a list of released DVD
hereItzjustdrama(
drama?) 17:07, 21 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Lead
The reason I put the number of episodes in the lead was because the featured episodes lists did the same. The same with the themes written in prose form. I believe that should be restored. And that information is crucial and should be easily accessible. The lead is the most accessible part of the article as it is at the top.
Itzjustdrama(
drama?) 02:43, 27 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Omakes
Should we put when they started with the omakes? I believe it starts on episode 52. Anonomous#2 00:40, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
It doesn't really contribute anything to the article and the topic. So I believe we shouldn't add them.
Itzjustdrama? 00:44, 15 September 2008 (UTC)reply
D.Gray-man Ending?
Is D.Gray-man being cancelled or on a indefinite hiatus after episode 103? —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
147.4.230.79 (
talk) 05:31, 17 September 2008 (UTC)reply
I believe after episode 103 is a third series.--
Frontier95 (
talk) 08:08, 20 September 2008 (UTC)reply
There is sufficient evidence there is and there isn't going to be a 104th episode. The best is to wait and see right now.
Itzjustdrama? 14:21, 20 September 2008 (UTC)reply
Episode 103's trailer name it "last episode", which didn't happen at the end of season 1.
90.27.80.222 (
talk) 15:58, 26 September 2008 (UTC)reply
Seperating parts
You do know D. Gray-man has series, right? Please seperate writing series 1 to episode 1 to 51. 52 starts with series 2. Start a new box with third series from episode 104. --
Frontier95 (
talk) 08:10, 20 September 2008 (UTC)reply
There isn't going to be a third series, per se, but a third season. Just clearing that up.
Itzjustdrama? 14:25, 20 September 2008 (UTC)reply
Clean-up
Although a
WP:FT or
WP:GT is a long-term project, I believe that this article needs to be attended to right away. I could probably do some copy-editing or take a knife to the episode summaries.
Itzjustdrama? 01:23, 22 September 2008 (UTC)reply
Not without a source. This proposal has been raised before in regards to other chapter and episode lists, and it's been decided that generally, this information is unsuitable for inclusion without a reference, and even then, it should only be mentioned in the lead IIRC. —
Dinoguy1000 18:32, 30 October 2008 (UTC)reply
The
Japanese article does have this info, and it fits quite nicely. It's both a counterargument to AnmaFinotera and others who insist such information is unsuitable, and a notice to those seeking this info. --
Dr.Koljan (
talk) 17:03, 27 January 2009 (UTC)reply
It's not about whether the info "fits quite nicely", it's about
sourcing it reliably - otherwise, it's just a bunch of
original research, regardless of how obvious it may seem to you or anyone else. 「
ダイノガイ千?!」(Dinoguy1000) 20:16, 27 January 2009 (UTC)reply
Season One's List
What happened to "List of D.Gray-man episodes season 1?
Why does it shows the link and do not open it out?
--
Frontier95 (
talk) 11:59, 19 March 2009 (UTC)reply
Could you be more specific? I don't see any problem with it - it's displaying exactly as it should, both here and on
its sublist. 「
ダイノガイ千?!」(Dinoguy1000) 20:10, 19 March 2009 (UTC)reply
English Adaptation
Has the English version started airing?--
Frontier95 (
talk) 15:25, 24 March 2009 (UTC)reply
I personally don't think it's airing, instead it's being released over four DVDs. ~
ItzjustdramaC? 19:25, 24 March 2009 (UTC)reply
D.Gray-Man arcs
Does anyone have a list of the arcs of D.Gray-Man? -
84.189.252.105 (
talk) 19:28, 22 April 2009 (UTC)reply
I have just modified 5 external links on
List of D.Gray-man episodes. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
I have just modified one external link on
List of D.Gray-man episodes. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
I have just modified 3 external links on
List of D.Gray-man episodes. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.