This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Austria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles about
Austria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please
join the project.AustriaWikipedia:WikiProject AustriaTemplate:WikiProject AustriaAustria articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bavaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Bavaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BavariaWikipedia:WikiProject BavariaTemplate:WikiProject BavariaBavaria articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related articles
Is there a better word to use for this category? I dont think those facts are trivial, but are definitely worth noting.
How about miscellaneous facts or simply miscellaneous? That sounds more useful than trivia, I think. Any thoughts?
Hydraton31 14:40, 29 April 2006 (UTC)reply
"Goebbels shot himself and his wife on May 1, in that order." How is that possible? Where is the reference for this?
—The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
Giovanni33 (
talk •
contribs) .
Is this article based on
François Genoud's book, first published in 1961? Some consider it a questionable document or even outright forgery, see
[1] (esp. note 10 on p. 575) and
[2]. --
El Cazangero (
talk) 04:46, 3 June 2008 (UTC)reply
No it is not
[3]. It was based on the sources (as all it does it list what they contain). If you need further citations then use {{fact}} rather than {{refimprove}}. --
Philip Baird Shearer (
talk) 12:34, 24 October 2008 (UTC)reply
According to David Irving the Last Testament of Adolf Hitler is a forgery by Francois Genoud. Whether it is the same as what is discussed in this Wikipedia article is something that I am trying to determine myself.
Hadding (
talk) 21:42, 4 January 2009 (UTC)reply
See the article on
David Irving and the outcome of the Libel suit David Irving v. Penguin Books and Deborah Lipstadt Mr. Justice Gray concluded "Irving has for his own ideological reasons persistently and deliberately misrepresented and manipulated historical evidence". Allegations by Irving do not warrant further investigation. --
PBS (
talk) 09:18, 31 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Regarding the Testament itself, maybe you should read
this page. And, you really shouldn't be so selective in your quotes because Mr. Justice Gray also stated on April 11, 2000: "As a military historian, Irving has much to commend him. For his works of military history Irving has undertaken thorough and painstaking research into the archives. He has discovered and disclosed to historians and others many documents which, but for his efforts, might have remained unnoticed for years. It was plain from the way in which he conducted his case and dealt with a sustained and penetrating cross-examination that his knowledge of World War 2 is unparalleled. His mastery of the detail of the historical documents is remarkable. He is beyond question able and intelligent. He was invariably quick to spot the significance of documents which he had not previously seen. Moreover he writes his military history in a clear and vivid style. I accept the favourable assessment by Professor Watt and Sir John Keegan of the calibre of Irving's military history (mentioned in paragraph 3.4 above) and reject as too sweeping the negative assessment of Evans (quoted in paragraph 3.5). But the questions to which this action has given rise do not relate to the quality of Irving's military history but rather to the manner in which he has written about the attitude adopted by Hitler towards the Jews and in particular his responsibility for the fate which befell them under the Nazi regime." (Source
1,
2,
3) —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
77.98.119.178 (
talk) 07:01, 6 April 2010 (UTC)reply
umm, shouldn't it be mentioned that hitler's last testament was faked by Francois Genoud? Genoud admitted to Irving that the entire typescript was his own confection saying, "But it is just what Hitler would have said, isn't it?" In other words, Hitler's Last Testament was and is a fake. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
173.171.71.251 (
talk) 03:48, 16 May 2011 (UTC)reply
It appears that there are two entirely separate documents with confusingly similar names. On the one hand there's the last will and testament, which includes a political testament. On the other hand there's the "testament of Adolf Hitler." The latter document is the one that Irving alleged Genoud had forged. There seems little point in this article discussing that document in any detail, but maybe there should be a sentence or two distinguishing the two documents.
Kevin Nelson (
talk) 03:00, 20 November 2012 (UTC)reply
1. Since it was found at war's end and was given to Harry S. Truman, then it couldn't be faked. There were 3 copies made.
The Last Will and Testamemt of Adolf Hitler, referenced in the further reading section, is a white supremecist publication. Just a few moments into the introduction I'd read about the great mind of Adolf Hitler and the anti-Christ Jews. There must be a more appropriate link to the text of the document....
user: PurpleChez 6/19/14
I think its clear this is the forgery discussed above. Not really relevant to the article and certainly needs a better description. I'll check back in a while and if no one has cleaned this up, I will have a go.
Testbed (
talk) 16:52, 22 June 2014 (UTC)reply
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
Last will and testament of Adolf Hitler. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
In addition to this source,[1] it is even noted in the WikiSource page cited in this article that Hitler stated in that last will and testament that Bormann was "given full legal authority to make all decisions. He is permitted to take out everything that has a sentimental value or is necessary for the maintenance of a modest simple life, for my brothers and sisters, also above all for the mother of my wife and my faithful co-workers who are well known to him, principally my old Secretaries Frau Winter etc. who have for many years aided me by their work."
2601:447:4080:10:310F:6143:507F:94B0 (
talk) 15:25, 14 December 2021 (UTC)reply
^Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression, Government Printing Office, Washington, 1946-1948, vol. VI, pg. 259-260.