This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Jack Speiden article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
This is actually a interesting article with connection of historical people.
Contrary to the user above, I'm not sure what the point of this article is. Yes, this man had an interesting life, but that doesn't make him notable enough to have a wikipedia article on him. At the very least, this article requires a major rewrite- it is far too chatty, informal and it attempts more at entertainment than information. There needs to be a real review of this article's status. Bosola 12:32, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
This article has major issues. Sounds like it was written by someone who knew Speiden personally. Also, the writing style is also incorrect. They use "Jack" over "Speiden" in some sentences.
Needs more citations, otherwise, I would recommend it for deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexf505 ( talk • contribs) 05:33, 14 February 2017 (UTC)