This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Languages This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Indonesia Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Melanesia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Melanesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Melanesia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MelanesiaWikipedia:WikiProject MelanesiaTemplate:WikiProject MelanesiaMelanesia articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

What about the intense criticism this theory has received? It can't be omitted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.6.163.234 ( talk) 02:11, 27 November 2007 (UTC) reply

How is it omitted? The article is currently highly critical of the hypothesis, if brief. I do not see a single positive statement about it; the article is even more lacking in that. -- JWB ( talk) 06:13, 27 November 2007 (UTC) reply

Why did you delete my comment ???? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.147.147.207 ( talk) 14:29, 3 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Just because i don't yet have an a account on this site that does't mean to discredit my opinions or finding , What i have posted could be very big eye opener .

This is censorship and this is Immoral and Shameful ノಠ_ಠノ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.147.147.207 ( talk) 14:42, 3 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Hey, so there is another proposed language family under the same name. What should be done about that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tealyt ( talk • contribs) 01:46, 29 January 2021 (UTC) reply

@ Tealyt: Can you give some more info here about the other proposed language family with the same name? As long we don't have a page about it, there's no need to disambiguate the title of this article. And whether we should have a page about the other proposal, rests on its notability. – Austronesier ( talk) 14:11, 29 January 2021 (UTC) reply

@Austronesier /info/en/?search=List_of_Indo-European_languages#Hypothetical_ancestors look here — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tealyt ( talk • contribs) 19:55, 29 January 2021 (UTC) reply

@ Tealyt: Oh I see. It was inserted with this edit [1] without any supporting sources, and frankly, this looks like made-up stuff which we'd better remove, unless someone finds independent reliable sources about the "other Indo-Pacific". – Austronesier ( talk) 21:11, 29 January 2021 (UTC) reply