This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Ideology article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 365 days |
This
level-3 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I really think we need to add something on Louis Althusser's notions of ideology and ideological right now, so I've added the wiki page about his work to the See Also section for now. -- Voyager640 2:40, 3 Nov 2003 (PST)
Didnt really looked this pg before, but unwittingly I did something in the direction of Voyager's suggestion, adding the section 3: I~ as an instrument of soc repr'n (which has plenty of room for expanding).
But there is a structural problem with the previous material: Section 2 and sub- 2.1 are really at the same level and should come under a same heading at Section level. Something like (this just an exampple):
2 Many kinds of (Philosophical?) ideologies 2.1 Epistemological I~ 2.2 Political I~ ... (any number of other I~)
Can he or she who did that section (or anyone else akin in thought) find a name for that Section 2 ? Deák 18:38, 2004 Aug 4 (UTC)
There is a structural problem with material of Section 2: Section 2 itself and sub- 2.1 are really at the same level and should come under a same heading at Section level. Something like (this just an exampple):
2 Many kinds of (Philosophical?) ideologies 2.1 Epistemological I~ 2.2 Political I~ ... (any number of other I~)
Can he or she who did that section (or anyone else akin in thought; or anyone) find a name for that Section 2 ? -- Deák 22:19, 2004 Aug 10 (UTC)
The much smaller scale concept of groupthink also owes something to his [Antonio Gramsci's] work.
could someone provide a source for this? Hanshans23
The Marxist and critical-theory accounts of the proposition of ideology are certainly pertinent points of discussion, but seems inappropriate for the general overview supplied at the head of the article. A preferable place for said points would be under the "Marxist view" subsection of "Analysis", which would work to preserve the neutrality of the article as a whole.
I've added an "Explain" tag after the sentence that reads,
In societies that distinguish between public and private life, every political or economic tendency entails ideology, whether or not it is propounded as an explicit system of thought.
This claim needs either a citation or some elaboration. It is not clear what the author means by "political tendencies entail (logically imply) ideology".
This obscure sentence probably refers to the newly created Institut National (now Institut de France), of which Tracy was a founding associate, specifically in the in the class of the moral and political sciences.
Hopefully a native writer will sometime wikify this paragraph. Noliscient ( talk) 13:45, 13 November 2023 (UTC)