This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Hey, uh, Blu-ray didn't exist in 2004...so, how could this film have been released on Blu-ray then?
Furthermore there ISN'T an official blu-ray for devdas. It doesn't exist. There's only a bootleg taiwanese version on Blu-ray, which can hardly be called an improvement over the DVD...
There are a few empty listings on Blu-ray.com (the source that was put for the statement i'm complaining about) of titles that were speculated or announced that were coming and never got released, and this was one of them. the listing on blu-ray .com never got removed. any google search will tell you devdas never had a blu-ray. only a middling DVD and a streaming service release. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
152.15.113.4 (
talk) 12:52, 15 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Fair use rationale for Image:Devdas.jpg
Image:Devdas.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under
fair use but there is no
explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the
boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with
fair use.
Please go to
the image description page and edit it to include a
fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on
criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 23:44, 2 June 2007 (UTC)reply
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Devdas (2002 Hindi film). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
I have just modified 2 external links on
Devdas (2002 Hindi film). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
To the Dallas-based IP editor who keeps changing the |gross= parameter to 36 crore/360 million, even if we were to use
this blog you seem attached to, (which is an insufficient source per
WP:UGC) you still appear to be misinterpreting the gross they report. The |gross= parameter is for worldwide gross. That figure in the blog is 61.5 crore/615 million. "Worldwide theatrical share" is irrelevant to that parameter, and to the article, really. There's nothing at
MOS:FILM that encourages the addition of nett gross, share, or other micro-financial details. Budget and gross are the figures we typically care about. If you or
Vibhss wish to deviate from Wikipedia's Manual of Style for Film, you'll both need to establish a local consensus. Otherwise, the content should be brought into conformity with community editing guidelines. Thanks.
Cyphoidbomb (
talk) 19:54, 8 March 2017 (UTC)reply
Box office gross
Two IPs
199.67.7.33 and
12.159.30.5 are repeatedly changing box office gross citing a blog source called "Bollybusiness" and misinterpreting even that source as explained by
Cyphoidbomb (
talk·contribs) in above message. For the kind information of these IP users, we can't use personal or group blogs like "Bollybusiness" as sources on Wikipedia as mentioned in
Wikipedia:Verifiability and
WP:ICTF. These are different from
newsblogs which are usually considered reliable. Besides,
Box Office India along with some other sources has been agreed upon being reliable on
WP:ICTF. For the IP user pointing to an BOI archive, I would like to inform him that we do have original sources of BOI which mention precisely detailed figures for Devdas[1][2] (Of course, you need to properly analyse these sources to correctly interpret them). So, we don't need to use outdated, unclear and under-detailed archive like the one you are pointing to. If you two IP users have problem with figures of original BOI sources, start a discussion on talk page of
WP:ICTF with ICTF members and ask them why they have put BOI in the list of reliable sources. Devdas page got semi-protected because of your repeated vandalism and will continue to be so if you continued vandalism.
Vibhss (
talk) 13:16, 9 March 2017 (UTC)reply
The disambiguation page shows about a dozen different films made from this book, of which this is evidently the most successful. I realize that only a few people would understand all the languages of those movies, but I think an article (or at least a section) comparing and contrasting the different films made of Devdas would be interesting. I would not be surprised if, as if some remakes of movies in Hollywood, there were significant plot changes to give each movie its particular attraction, especially after this 2002 Hindi version appeared.
Sussmanbern (
talk) 21:27, 15 January 2018 (UTC)reply
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on
Devdas (2002 Hindi film). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
The major part of the movie was filmed in
Mumbai, recreating early 20th-century
Calcutta. Chandramukhi's
kotha was constructed next to an artificial lake, to make it look like a set in
Varanasi on the
Ganges.[1] A temple city surrounded the set, for which inspiration was taken from the
Dilwara Temples in
Rajasthan.[2] For the creation of Paro's room in a
haveli, 12,000 pieces of stained glass were used.[3][4][5]
At the time of its release, Devdas was one of the most expensive
Bollywood films ever produced, with reported budget of ₹30
crore[4] ($10.3 million).[6] The film released worldwide on 12 July 2002. The film was a commercial success in India and abroad, becoming the highest grossing Indian film of the year. Shah Rukh Khan has bought the rights to this film under his banner,
Red Chillies Entertainment.[7]
Devdas was critically acclaimed among western and Indian film critics and is considered by many critics to be one of the greatest films ever made.[8] It was nominated for the
BAFTA Award for Best Foreign Language Film and was also
India's submission for the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film. It was ranked #74 in Empire magazine's "The 100 Best Films Of World Cinema" in 2010.[9]TIME magazine named Devdas as the best film of 2002 among all the movies released around the world that year.[10] The film was recently included in TIME's Top 10 Movies Of The Millennium Worldwide.[11]
Devdas grossed ₹68.19
crore in India and $6.5 million (₹31.68 crore) in other countries, for a worldwide total of ₹99.87 crore, according to Box Office India,[14] excluding China.[15] The film had an extraordinary opening worldwide and recorded highest opening weekend and week of the year with collections of ₹19.83 crore[16] and ₹33.45 crore respectively.[17] It was the
highest-grossing Bollywood film of 2002 worldwide.[18]
It opened on Friday, 12 July 2002, across 325 screens, and grossed the highest opening-day of the year with figure of ₹2.09 crore nett.[19] It became the second film to gross ₹2 crore nett opening day after Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham.... It also had highest opening weekend and week of the year with collections of ₹6.15 crore nett[20] and ₹11.78 crore nett respectively.[21] The film earned a total of ₹41.65 crore nett.[14] It was the
highest-grossing film of 2002 in India.[22]
Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (
talk) 12:04, 23 March 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Nicholas Michael Halim: Great work on improving the article to GA-status. For future reference, I suggest you send/submit your articles to the
Guild of Copy Editors. They are a group who basically fix typos and any errors for you, and it can make it easier for GA-reviewers like me, so I won't have to add multiple suggestions about typos. Once again, great work, I'm passing the article for GA, just keep that group in mind before nominating.
Some Dude From North Carolina (
talk) 13:14, 25 March 2021 (UTC)reply