This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Note the bias inherent in the following phrases. Article needs, at least, POV tag until these are changed:
the premier institute
international flagship
It fulfills
clarifying the right way
revealing
opinions of jurists throughout history
important role
helping Muslims live their lives according to the principles of Islam so they may find happiness in this life and obtain the best reward in the Afterlife.
Wikify: links need to be added coming out of and into this article.
As MatthewVanitas has pointed out, there is inherent bias in the
weasel words used.
The
lede gives little context to what the article is about.
The references could be improved;
secondary sources in English should be added to the article.
Bearian (
talk) 00:02, 4 March 2009 (UTC)reply
I wikified and copyedited a bit, adding an Unref tag and 3 stub tags.
Bearian (
talk) 00:07, 4 March 2009 (UTC)reply
Agreed, needs work. It doesn't even say where in Egypt it is located. There's no critical discussion, no objective evaluation. Almost reads like an ad.
Benefac (
talk) 02:46, 28 June 2011 (UTC)reply
removing POV template without ongoing discussion per
Template:POV instructions
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at
Template:POV:
This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! --
Khazar2 (
talk) 19:01, 25 June 2013 (UTC)reply