From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Magnus opus

I think it would be good to present a summary of Bernard's magnum opus, -- An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine because it is a classic and says a great deal about the ethics of science and the misuse of science today.-- samivel 18:15, 15 December 2005 (UTC) reply

Review comments

Some suggestions for improvement as the article is expanded:

  • Template:Infobox Scientist should be added
  • Needs copy editing for grammar in places
  • Lead needs expanding to cover all aspects of the subject's life and research
  • Further organisation of the article would be beneficial; the section on An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine is currently disproportionately long
  • A graphic relating to An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine would be interesting, eg cover of first edition
  • Information on research should be expanded and inline references are important
  • References should be expanded to cover all facts and claims, and should be converted to the inline format
  • External links present which could be used to expand article

Espresso Addict 21:09, 23 July 2007 (UTC) reply

  • Need to double check quotations. Bernard was quoted asserting that "theories are verified hypotheses" when in fact he said "theories are only hypotheses." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.8.217.15 ( talk) 22:54, 11 May 2008 (UTC) reply
  • There's no evidence for some quotations. I'm especially interested in proof for the quotations on the "milieu interieur".

Cupinfurs ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:39, 7 March 2010 (UTC). reply

Brothers Karamazov

Reading this has sparked a memory. Is this the "Bernard" who's name in the trouble mind of Demitri Karamazov becomes a shorthand for all those who he holds in contempt for their rationalistic, materialistic, godless and dishonerable "european" mindsets. Thus on a number of occasions, and to general incomprehension, he is heard to bitterly accuse his accusers of being nothing but "Bernards".

A quick google suggest it is, "...Claude Bernard. What was he? Chemist or what?"

"He must be a savant," answered Alyosha; "but I confess I can't tell you much about him, either. I've heard of him as a savant, but what sort I don't know."

"Well, damn him, then! I don't know either," swore Mitya. "A scoundrel of some sort, most likely. They are all scoundrels. And Rakitin will make his way. Rakitin will get on anywhere; he is another Bernard. Ugh, these Bernards! They are all over the place."

Maybe not directly relevant; but surley having a minor part in one of the greats of world literature is worth a mention. It also illustates the general renown of Bernard, as Dostoyevsky seems to expect the reader to know who he is.

I'll put a mention of it on the page if no one objects. And if I can be bothered

Passerby 77.102.27.103 ( talk) 15:10, 16 May 2010 (UTC) reply

References

The references need to be fixed so that every reference refers to a specific work rather than just a page number. Otherwise if the 3rd reference is ever removed or replaced, all the other references will become meaningless. Kaldari ( talk) 20:01, 23 January 2011 (UTC) reply

 Done -- Kubanczyk ( talk) 13:11, 18 April 2013 (UTC) reply

Religion

I should point out that the evidence that he was a fervent Catholic seems to come from the letter of one person after Bernard's death mentioned in one article (Donnet 1998). I tracked down the text of the article but unfortunately my French is almost non-existent (and Google translate can take one only so far); however, I'm not sure the letter shows a fervent Catholic (I've added the url to the ref for someone with better French). I also note that the entry in the Catholic Encyclopedia makes no mention of his religiosity other than he attended a Jesuit school in his youth. Having an entry in that Encyclopedia does not guarantee the person is a good Catholic (Martin Luther has an entry) and it is misleading to use it in this entry to imply that Bernard was a good Catholic. -- Erp ( talk) 07:29, 31 August 2019 (UTC) reply