From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:CMLL 68th Anniversary Show/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 18:17, 28 November 2016 (UTC) reply


Hi, I will be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAG UAR  18:17, 28 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Repetition of "the show" in the lead
    Arena México is linked three times in the background section
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a ( reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR):
    No original research found. AGF for offline sources
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a ( major aspects): b ( focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    NPOV
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    Stable
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b ( appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Good work as usual. JAG UAR  15:48, 29 November 2016 (UTC) reply