This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Antarctica, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Antarctica on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AntarcticaWikipedia:WikiProject AntarcticaTemplate:WikiProject AntarcticaAntarctica articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the
Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the
welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject South America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
South America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject South AmericaTemplate:WikiProject South AmericaSouth America articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gibraltar, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gibraltar and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GibraltarWikipedia:WikiProject GibraltarTemplate:WikiProject GibraltarGibraltar articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Polynesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Polynesia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolynesiaWikipedia:WikiProject PolynesiaTemplate:WikiProject PolynesiaPolynesia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Overseas Territories, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
British Overseas Territories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British Overseas TerritoriesWikipedia:WikiProject British Overseas TerritoriesTemplate:WikiProject British Overseas TerritoriesBritish Overseas Territories articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire articles
This article is written in
British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
Police and Enforcement
Regarding the Police and Enforcement part of section 5 Government Currently there is nothing about uniforms and equipment those police forces use. There was something about that in previous versions of the Police uniforms and equipment in the United Kingdom article. That could be added to this article. --
Dreddmoto (
talk) 22:05, 10 May 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Dreddmoto: Uniforms aren't something I generally work on. As far as the article goes, it's probably better to cover it in the UK police article. I don't see the main article on a topic like BOT as suitable for such details, other than a brief, cited mention.
BilCat (
talk) 01:19, 31 July 2022 (UTC)reply
Thanks for your view. I'll keep that in mind. Would it better to cover the subject of uniforms and equipment in a new, separate article? --
Dreddmoto (
talk) 01:36, 31 July 2022 (UTC)reply
If you have enough cited material to make a decent article, sure.
BilCat (
talk) 01:45, 31 July 2022 (UTC)reply
Does the motto really deserve its high-profile place in this table? I suggest that the currency in use is more valuable to the general reader. Any objections to my moving the motto to a new column at the end of each row and using the current column for currency?
𝕁𝕄𝔽 (
talk) 12:15, 24 September 2022 (UTC)reply
We probably shouldn't have either. Neither feels a key attribute of each territory, or helpful to a reader in understanding the topic of BOTs.
CMD (
talk) 12:36, 24 September 2022 (UTC)reply
TBH, I can't see the value of mottoes either but hesitated to go trampling in. But I suggest that the currency is interesting in that it shows which have decoupled from Sterling despite being still nominally British territories. Obviously if it just says e.g. "Bermudan Dollar", that is not useful but that it is pegged to USD certainly is. --
𝕁𝕄𝔽 (
talk) 13:16, 24 September 2022 (UTC)reply
confusing, possibly contradictory sentence
"Although the British Government is the national government, much of governance within the territories has been delegated to local government, with all of those that have permanent populations having some degree of representative government (which was not the case for British Hong Kong) which have been delegated responsibility for local legislation (although the inhabitants of the first colony established, Virginia (including Bermuda from 1612), were in 1606 (a century before the Kingdom of England and the Kingdom of Scotland united to form the Kingdom of Great Britain)), irrevocably guaranteed the same rights and representation they would have if born in England, representation in the national Parliament of the United Kingdom has yet to be extended to any overseas territory."
This sentence is overly long, with way too many parentheses; confusing; and possibly self-contradictory - Do inhabitants have the same representation as people in England, or not? I can't tell if this sentence is saying that a) they do; b) they don't; c) legally they should but in practice they don't; d) the 17th century charter should give that right to Bermuda but now they don't have it.
I'm surprised by the 17th century charter aspect, too, because the *lack* of representation of the Thirteen Colonies, including Virginia, in Parliament was a major grievance leading to the American Revolution (
taxation without representation) so it would be very odd to find that Virginia did have that right.
I am also not sure why the dates of founding of the Virginia colony and Bermuda belong in this paragraph, which is about current government, not history.
Vultur~enwiki (
talk) 14:49, 23 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Syntax error
There is a problem of which requires professional handling for Syntax error, can someone please help me. Thanks. The problem seems to be when I place the following command
British Overseas Territories, instead of explaining about the place, it shows Error: Missing Redirect Perimeter
180.129.33.96 (
talk) 11:30, 28 May 2024 (UTC)reply
redirects are for automatically sending someone to a different article. They are not used at the top of an article. Please leave the header templates alone if you are unfamiliar with them. Cambial —
foliar❧ 11:42, 28 May 2024 (UTC)reply
How many British Overseas Territories are there?
The section
Current Overseas Territories says there are 14 but lists 13. The next section says that Akrotiri and Dhekelia are not Overseas Territories, but are Sovereign Base Areas (SBAs).
The situation (afaics) is that there are indeed 14 overseas territories and that the Sovereign Base Areas are included in that. Though they are not overseen by the FCDO but come under the Ministry of Defence.
Anyway, long and short is that there are 14, they include Akrotiri and Dhekelia. There are substantial differences between the way it all works in the SBAs and in other overseas territories but there are quite a lot of differences between the other overseas territories too.
Jo0228 (
talk) 20:16, 5 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Legally, there are only 13. The Sovereign Base Areas (A & D) are not legally BOTs. However, many sources say 14 because they don't want to bother with the technical details. --
𝕁𝕄𝔽 (
talk) 22:13, 5 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Where you say "Legally", it would be useful to have a reference. My understanding of the
British Overseas Territories Act, which is primary legislation, is that the Sovereign Base Areas are indeed British Overseas Territories.
In section 1. (1)
"As the territories mentioned in Schedule 6 to the British Nationality Act 1981 (c. 61) are now known as “British overseas territories”
The Sovereign Base Areas of Akrotiri and Dhekelia (that is to say the areas mentioned in section 2(1) of the
M1Cyprus Act 1960)
Turks and Caicos Islands
Virgin Islands.
Jo0228 (
talk) 15:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC)reply
I'm sure you are right. The source cited in the lead says much the same thing. Obviously in the case of the SBRs, the (non-HM forces and their families) residents have no say in their administration as they do on the 'ordinary' BOTs. So I suspect that "it depends". The same might be said of the BAT, of course.
𝕁𝕄𝔽 (
talk) 17:03, 6 June 2024 (UTC)reply
We need a source that explains this. Probably when Cyprus became independent in 1960 and the UK retained bases, they did not want to call them colonies, for both legal and political reasons, which is what BOTs were called at the time.
TFD (
talk) 02:13, 7 June 2024 (UTC)reply