This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Sailing Low‑importance Beneteau Oceanis 281 is within the scope of the WikiProject Sailing, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Sailing. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.SailingWikipedia:WikiProject SailingTemplate:WikiProject SailingSailing articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. France Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Raked stem should not link to Stem (ship), and reverse transom should not link to Transom (nautical), any more than gaff cutter should link to cutter. It should be written as gaff cutter. This has nothing to do with favouring redirects over pipes. It's about usefulness. Nobody wants to click on a link to find out it is not what they thought. -- Cornellier ( talk) 23:02, 30 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Raked stem redirects to Stem (ship), because it specifically describes raked stems: There are two styles of stems: plumb and raked. When the stem comes up from the water, if it is perpendicular to the waterline it is "plumb". If it is inclined at an angle to the waterline it is "raked". Reverse transom redirects to Transom (nautical) because it specifically describes reverse transoms: A reverse transom is angled from the waterline forwards. These redirects are entirely accurate and appropriate, which is why they are used in hundreds of articles. WP:NOTBROKEN precisely explains this situation and why these redirects should not be removed and replaced with direct links: There is usually nothing wrong with linking to redirects to articles. Some editors are tempted, upon finding a link to a redirect page, to bypass the redirect and point the link directly at the target page. However, changing to a piped link is beneficial only in a few cases. Piping links solely to avoid redirects is generally a time-wasting exercise that can actually be detrimental. It is almost never helpful to replace [[redirect]] with [[target|redirect]]. You would need to make a very good case to disregard this guideline. - Ahunt ( talk) 23:12, 30 January 2021 (UTC) reply