This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montreal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Montreal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontrealWikipedia:WikiProject MontrealTemplate:WikiProject MontrealMontreal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire articles
According to the box describing the battle, there were no more than 200 on the British/Native side, but in the text, the force strength is listed as 650. Which is right?
Dave 06:07, 19 April 2006 (UTC)reply
Poor quality
There is a couple of problems connected to this article:
1. Its difficult to read. Some sentences is not complete and its all written in one paragraf.
2. Its not about the battle. Its about what happened to the soldiers after the battle.
Shauni 21:27, 10 August 2006 (UTC)reply
The Vaudreuil article is currently a nearly-empty stub. Establishing context to explain the action in a separate article (see the
section on the skirmish in this article) would require largely replicating this article. Magic♪piano 21:42, 22 January 2009 (UTC)reply
Well, since there was such strong feeling, I went ahead and "merged" (replaced Vaudreuil article with redirect here). Magic♪piano 17:36, 27 January 2009 (UTC)reply
Other than the minor items that I fixed (listed above), I could find nothing lacking in this article, so I am passing it. Great job! —
Bellhalla (
talk) 02:10, 4 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Given that you have used the correctly dated flags for Great Britain and the United Colonies, it seems a bit anachronistic to use an Iroquois flag from the 1980s in this article. If the Iroquois used a single flag at the time then that should be used, if not then you shouldn't use any flag at all for them.--
Jackyd101 (
talk) 02:28, 4 May 2009 (UTC)reply
I'm not conversant in the history of the Iroquois banner. If in fact this use is anachronistic, it is hardly alone in WP, as it is is used in quite a few Revolutionary War (and earlier) articles. (I have no objection to altering this condition, just noting that it exists.) Magic♪piano 03:54, 4 May 2009 (UTC)reply
The banner is a modern construct and as such is anchronistic. I would recommend removing it from this page and any others that predate its development.--
Jackyd101 (
talk) 14:11, 4 May 2009 (UTC)reply
I estimate that 20-30 of the
flag 80 or so usages of the flag may be at issue. I'll certainly remove it from articles I work on. Magic♪piano 15:39, 4 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Quinze Chiens name
I don't know how to enter info correctly here without messing up someone's work, but I have a comment. I was told and have seen in records that the place called Quinze Chiens is a francization of the native american word Quenechoen.
Andielemmer (
talk) 12:35, 24 April 2010 (UTC)Andielemmerreply
What sort of records did you see? If it's published in some sort of book or scholarly publication, we could definitely use it. Magic♪piano 14:42, 24 April 2010 (UTC)reply