This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Battle of Maudach article. This is
not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is written in
American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
CE
Did a cheeky little CE, tidied prose, awkward translations (?) - to – hyphenated isbns; rv as desired.
Keith-264 (
talk) 17:25, 24 September 2017 (UTC)reply
B-Class criterion 1
Auntieruth55; I have upped the article to C-class rather than leaving it in limbo. There was a citation needed tag placed, by me, on the end of a paragraph in the article.
AustralianRupert has tentatively removed that CN tag and replaced it with the most plausible reference. When somebody gets the chance to verify the following passage and citation, upgrade to B-class;
Louis Desaix, commanding the left (northern) column of the
Army of the Rhine and Moselle, had about 27,000 infantry and 3,000 cavalry when he crossed the Rhine at Maudach. He faced Petrasch's division of about a third of the size, including mixed troops of infantry and dragoons.<ref name=Dodge286/>
Cool, glad that's sorted. My apologies for my role in the delay in getting it to B-class. Normally I post B-class reviews on the article talk page, but, as I only had the concern with the citation style and one citation I didn't think it was necessary to put it here. I have, however, learned my lesson about that.
Mr rnddude (
talk) 15:36, 3 October 2017 (UTC)reply