 | This article was nominated for deletion on 7 September 2018. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Consensus to not move, therefore, not moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 21:10, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Associativity-based routing → Associativity-Based Routing – Specific patented protocol and so is a proper noun ~ Kvng ( talk) 13:29, 7 September 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 22:28, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request ( permalink). SarekOfVulcan (talk) 13:34, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose. General English grammar rules are that the second word in a hyphenated word is not capitalized unless it is a proper noun on its own (e.g. "Anglo-Saxon"), which "based" is not. If this is in fact a proper noun, then it should be "Associativity-based Routing". Rreagan007 ( talk) 17:19, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose. As both the suggested uppercase and current lowercase are used in parallel and since the otherwise grammatically correct "Associativity-based Routing" is not commonly used, I prefer the current lower case. See some examples for lower case usage below. I suspect that scientific and other professionals that use "Associativity-Based Routing" (at times without hyphen) like the fact that the caps correspond with the abbreviation. We should prefer the solution that is both commonly used and grammatically correct. gidonb ( talk) 06:41, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
- Associativity-Based Routing for Ad Hoc Mobile Networks | SpringerLink
- https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1008812928561
- by CK Toh - 1997 - Cited by 1245 - Related articles
- In an ad-hoc mobile network where mobile hosts (MHs) are acting as routers and where routes are made inconsistent by MHs' movement, we employ an associativity-based routing scheme where a route is selected based on nodes having associativity states that imply periods of stability.
- Long-lived ad-hoc routing based on the concept of Associativity, IETF ...
- https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-manet-longlived-adhoc-routing-00.txt
- Abstract This document describes the associativity-based long-lived routing (ABR) protocol for ad hoc mobile networks.
- Self-Adaptive Trust Based ABR Protocol for MANETs Using Q-Learning
- https://www.hindawi.com/journals/tswj/2014/452362/
- by A Vijaya Kumar - 2014 - Cited by 6 - Related articles
- Jul 9, 2014 - Our work focuses on computing a score using Q-learning to weigh the trust of a particular node over associativity based routing (ABR) protocol.
- Associativity-based routing | Revolvy
- https://www.revolvy.com/page/Associativity%252Dbased-routing?
- Associativity-based routing[1][2][3][4] (commonly known as ABR) is a mobile routing protocol invented for wireless ad hoc networks or also known as mobile ad ...
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
This issue was brought up in the AFD discussion linked above. I think we've noticed that this article is pretty promotional and isn't quite up to Wikipedia's standards at the moment. It doesn't help that this is a topic that requires a lot of technical knowledge. It would be helpful if editors who are knowledgeable about the topic area could rewrite this article to be more encyclopedic. – FenixFeather (talk) (Contribs) 23:18, 21 September 2018 (UTC)