From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The page is linked to from pages about Canada

So clearly just describing how ONE political party in ONE country used the word is inadequate. 2604:3D09:D78:1000:377E:61DF:3EAC:2898 ( talk) 15:08, 19 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Good point. But as a starting point, this is an article about a fluid American political term, not a type of firearm. North8000 ( talk) 15:12, 19 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Is there any reason the scope of the article can't include analogous legislation in other countries? VQuakr ( talk) 16:12, 19 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Keeping in mind that "this is an article about a fluid American political term, not a type of firearm." The issue is "analogous in what way?" North8000 ( talk) 18:32, 19 March 2024 (UTC) reply
In the way that the term and concept is also used in Canadian firearms legislation/politics. [1]. VQuakr ( talk) 18:51, 19 March 2024 (UTC) reply