![]() | This article was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 September 2019 and 12 December 2019. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Ygplusplus.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 17:28, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This article is discussing a very speculative product. Nearly (if not all) the references simply reference the first Wall Street Journal article as their source for the existence of the product. Because this product is unannounced and all of the sources themselves see the prediction of the product as speculative, this article seems to violate part 5 of WP:CRYSTAL. Sorry, but I'm going to have to mark it as such. 158.222.170.250 ( talk) 19:49, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Despite the arguments made that articles like from the WSJ and others did not explicitly say "rumored" that doesn't mean they aren't reporting a rumor. I have reapplied the "Crystal" tag as the article clearly seems to violate part 5 of "Wikipedia is not a crystal ball". Of particular note, is the line "Speculation and rumor, even from reliable sources, are not appropriate encyclopedic content". Even if the reporters have some semblance of evidence, it's still speculative evidence and could hardly be thought to fit into "newly revealed products". Golmschenk ( talk) 03:24, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Although Wikipedia includes up-to-date knowledge about newly revealed products, short articles that consist only of product announcement information are not appropriate.This article doesn't concern a product announcement. The hatnote tag you applied should only be used for unreferenced material; seeing as the article cites plentiful reliable sources in accordance with Wikipedia's verifiability policy, it's not appropriate here. WP:CRYSTAL also states
It is appropriate to report discussion and arguments about the prospects for success of future proposals and projects or whether some development will occur, if discussion is properly referenced.Please take a look at the deletion nominations linked at the top of this talk page. Thanks! — zziccardi ( talk) 16:41, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Can include a picture of an apple with wheels?. On the other hand, think the more easy to make vehicle and transport in public transit is an autobalanced unicycle (that can also be called i-Unicycle or SmartUnicycle,for cities, while the car can be for longer distances.-- Lagoset ( talk) 16:39, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Apple electric car project. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:22, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
Some new developments: Apple about to acquire/hire Drive.ai: https://www.macrumors.com/2019/06/06/apple-plans-to-acquihire-driveai-report/
Have read online somewhere that the OS for autonomous driving will be called vehicleOS, but this is probably just an unverified rumor.
77.183.20.192 ( talk) 13:47, 6 June 2019 (UTC)