This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Assyria, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.AssyriaWikipedia:WikiProject AssyriaTemplate:WikiProject AssyriaAssyria articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt articles
We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.
Cleanup.
To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?
Standardize the Chronology.
A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)
Stub sorting
Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .
Data sorting.
This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Ancient Near East related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Iraq on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IraqWikipedia:WikiProject IraqTemplate:WikiProject IraqIraq articles
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Phoenicia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Phoenicia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.PhoeniciaWikipedia:WikiProject PhoeniciaTemplate:WikiProject PhoeniciaPhoenicia articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a
WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to
writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by
the project page and/or leave a query at
the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
24 of which have been recovered since the Norweigan Assyriologist J.A. Knudtzon's landmark edition, Die El-Amarna Tafeln (vol. 1 Leipzig, 1907; vol.2 Leipzig, 1915).
I do not understand this sentence.
Burschik 07:28, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Fair enough. I revised it to this: "The known tablets currently total 382 in number, 24 further tablets having been recovered since the Norwegian Assyriologist
J.A. Knudtzon's landmark edition of the Amarna correspondence, Die El-Amarna Tafeln in two volumes, (1907 and 1915)." Easier to chew? ;)
Wetman 07:39, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Enthusiastic new edits
I don't know how to revise the rash of new edits from
User:172.155.0.29 into neutral encyclopedic tone tied to some references without hurting feelings. It has to be accomplished somehow. --
Wetman04:01, 26 August 2005 (UTC)reply
I've moved them out of the introduction - I'm not sure how much they actually add to the article though!
Markh 17:02, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
I have deleted all of the newly added paragraphs. I understand that it would be best to try and integrate them, but, having read them, I feel there is nothing worthwhile in the text.
Oswax14:23, 22 September 2005 (UTC)reply
This article gives the reign of Akhenaton/Amenhotep IV as 1369-1353 BC. However, it says the letters also encompass Amenhotep III's reign. When I link to Amenhotep III, his reign overlaps the time that A IV supposedly reigned. Specifically, A III's reign is given as 1389-1351 BC or 1391-1353 BC. Please make Wikipedia more internally coherent. Someone (with a lot of ambition/time) may want to review all the dates given for the reigns of different pharaohs.
Sadly different chronologies (long/middle/short) have been used for different articles in wikipedia. It needs much work to get them together. That academic opinions on the chronologies are always changing does not help matters.
Oswax13:03, 17 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Abbreviations
I've seen a number of articles use the abbreviation "EA" in referring to documents from the Amarna Letters, but nowhere is this terminology explained. I would add this explanation myself, but at the moment I'm at work & don't have the necessary books at hand. --
llywrch16:55, 7 February 2006 (UTC)reply
EA is for "Tell el-Amarna". (However, the British Museum also numbers its museum items "EA".) The Amarna Letters are EA 1 thru EA 382, "el Amarna" 1, etc. --MMcAnnis,YumaAZ
Mmcannis04:15, 10 February 2006 (UTC)reply
I wasn't asking for an explanation for my use: I have the books at home with the answer. I was asking that an explanation be added to the article, hopefully one based on a quotable source. I only noticed this oversight in the article because I was away from my library, & I consulted this article in search for a quick answer. --
llywrch04:54, 10 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Hello Wetman and others, I see the article currently is planning a summary of all the letters, presumably all 300+ of them. I just wonder if this really is something Wikipedia should undertake, especially since a link to a summary is included under external links. I'm sure it is not beyond Wikipedia but it might be beyond this article. I'm only proposing the questions, is it desirable and is this the place?
Dave16:15, 24 March 2007 (UTC)reply
If you only knew how important each letter is... and how it interwikis to other people and events, and placenames. When EA26 says: "and to address this hurdle of the messengers", and the word 'hurdle' is the word for mountain, ...It is all about "words", and the phrases, idioms, and the actual 'Soap–opera Events' involved with each letter. "MyOpinion"..from the SonoranDesert of AZ,usa ..-
Mmcannis03:26, 25 March 2007 (UTC)reply
And this Period, is one important "nodal point" for linking other events. Hasn't anyone noticed that the
Hapiru, disappear, and then the history of Judaism, and the bible begins? ..SonDesert ..-
Mmcannis03:26, 25 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Map must be changed
Doesnt represent its era, crete was center of a seperate civilisation
Minoan unrelated with greeks probably close to luwians, Greeks invaded the island after the Troyan catastrophe. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Doganaktas (
talk •
contribs)
21:39, 26 April 2008 (UTC)reply
Uhm, no. By the mid-14th century BC, the Mycenaean Greek invasion of Crete had already taken place. There is no single historical "Trojan catastrophe".
Troy VII postdates the 14th century BC. --
Florian Blaschke (
talk)
16:26, 2 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Disposition of the letters today
This source [
[1]] doesn't match what the article says.
a little history revising here?
I have come to believe from wikipedia itself that the name was coined in the first century by the romans please be conservative using potential
plo soap
109.66.17.64 (
talk)
09:12, 26 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Linguistic significance
The language of the Amarna letters is known among semitists for its coloring by many "Canaanisms", which have helped to shed invaluable light on the proto-stage of the Canaanite languages, including pre-biblical Hebrew.[1][2] It would be useful to add a section on this topic to the page.
Drabkikker (
talk)
14:51, 19 March 2015 (UTC)reply