This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
6.5×52mm Carcano article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I guess that some rationale on my removal of citation need templates in this WP entry.
First of all, I write from Italy Itself, and I'm Italian, and here are at least 12M+ people whose can strongly disagree on the doubts on the ballistics of the Carcano '91 bullet and the rifle itself (that is,nearby every Male Italian born in 1948 or earlier, and in some services, even not few born from 1949 to ~1965)
Albeit I haven't the pleasure of having to do to this rifle first-hand, every people I know always talk well, if not very well, about this service rifle and cartrige, across social classes, cultural levels and politcal positions (a big social element here in Italy) and I'm pretty sure that a 100% endorsment rate should be a solid base on assessing this cartridge...
I can understand the serious doubts in the US of A on the Dallas assassination, starting with the Warren Report and the "magic bullet theory", but for the above said ~12M male Italians above, that one can do quickly multiple bullseye hits on slow-moving targets at some hundreds of yard with a telescope-equipped '91 is more than feasible and definitively in the realm of the possible.
concluded, a cartridge, much so a military cartrige, should be judged for its merits, esp. of people whose has to trust their life on the cartridge and the rifle firing it.
Best regards from Italy, dott.Piergiorgio ( talk) 14:52, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Saying that Oswald "is believed to have used" a 6.5 mm cartridge to assassinate JFK seems a bit too conspiratorial (and POV) for an encyclopedia article.-- 172.190.104.148 ( talk) 00:16, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
The Mannlicher part in the title is very questionable. If Mannlicher has something to do with the rifle, in the sense that it uses a mannlicher-style magazine (that was really taken from the Gew-88 rifle, and not from some Mannlicher design), the only thing that Mannlicher has to do with the cartridge is that he copied the samples (first the rimmed one, and then the rimless), given to him as one of many inventor participating in the competition for the selection of the new rifle, to make first the 6.5×53R, and then the 6.5×54mm Mannlicher-Schönauer cartridges. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.13.202.87 ( talk) 10:49, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
I believe the rifle was given a bad name due to the fact that the ammunition (rounds) was not sealed at the factory. Is there any truth to this? If so it might be included. Zedshort ( talk) 15:53, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Move. Cúchullain t/ c 13:34, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
6.5×52mm Mannlicher-Carcano →
6.5×52mm Carcano – for reasons stated in
this section of this talk page
M11rtinb (
talk) 09:14, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
the English version states that in Italian Army service this cartridge was loaded with "unstable round-nosed bullet with a propensity to tumble" but the Italian Wiki states exactly the opposite: the round nose bullet was not tumbling unless hitting hard bones and tended to leave "clean through" wounds. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.205.194.4 ( talk) 13:00, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
When using the term "Assault Rifle," it has to be select fire and chambers an intermediate cartridge. Arguably the Cei-Rigotti and the Federov Avtomat considered to be an earlier assault rifles before the Stg 44 but aren't intermediate cartridge are under 2 inches case length?. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KuronoX ( talk • contribs) 23:33, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
What was its Case capacity? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.101.38.242 ( talk) 05:26, 24 August 2019 (UTC) And what/which powder did it use? I think it was Nobel's?Solenite. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.101.38.242 ( talk) 04:26, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
There is a picture at the bottom of an en-bloc clip that is using oblong-rectangular cartridges & projectiles. I think there should be some reference to those particular cartridges. I have never seen 6.5mm Carcano in such a form (nor any cartridge for that matter. I assume they would have been designed in an attempt to maximize clip capacity along with maximal volumetric case capacity, but I assume there were probable shortcomings with burn rate/pattern and aerodynamic effectiveness of the projectile. However, the original source for the picture is no longer available and I can't find the original with any reference. Thi seems like something that should either be referenced (either in the article or the caption), or removed, as those unique cartridges seem to be out of place in this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:61:7C0C:BF00:25F9:5B83:ADFB:E4AC ( talk) 19:36, 3 January 2022 (UTC)