This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all
list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of
History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
November 30th, 2348 BC - It's not called "The God-Flood" for nothing! it's only the single most important event in the history of Mankind!! Redefining Demography, Theology, Technology, Geography, Geology, Astronomy, and Biology, how could this article brush past it without so much as a footnote!?
LutherVinci (
talk) 19:38, 2 December 2010 (UTC)reply
Because the chronology is not canonical. —
Arthur Rubin(talk) 07:09, 3 December 2010 (UTC)reply
I would suggest that the difference between this and the
Egyptian Chronology is that for the latter we have (i) multiple reliable
WP:SECONDARY sources, who are (ii) able to base their work on multiple
chronological synchronisms, rather than just a single source. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 08:52, 20 December 2010 (UTC)reply