The
contentious topics procedure applies to this article. Parts of this article relate to the
Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing the parts of the page related to the contentious topic:
You must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on this article (except in
limited circumstances)
If it is unclear which parts of the page are related to this contentious topic, the content in question should be marked within the wiki text by an invisible comment. If no comment is present, please ask an administrator for assistance. If in doubt it is better to assume that the content is covered.
The
contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1978 Iranian politics, which has been
designated as a contentious topic.
The subject of this article is
controversial and content may be in
dispute. When updating the article,
be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a
neutral point of view. Include
citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to
Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please
join the project where you can contribute to the
discussions and help with our
open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Why hasn't it been updated that Israel is retaliating?
Brudelman (
talk) 11:40, 20 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The place to suggest changing that headline would be
WP:ITNC.
SilverLocust💬 00:35, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Requested move 19 April 2024
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
2024 Israeli strikes on Iran → 2024 Israeli strikes in Isfahan – This is a retaliation to a retaliation, but that article was not named as a retaliation. So the same should apply here, and it would get more confusing if Iran retaliates to this attack. It would be weird to call such article a retaliation to a retaliation to a retaliation, this hasn't been done before.
Bigfatman8766 (
talk) 05:14, 19 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Support - The name of this article should be changed. The first “actual” retaliatory attack article is titled “
2024 Iranian strikes in Israel” without mentioning “retaliatory” word at the title and how come this article can be titled as retaliatory? People will say that Wikipedia is biased to Israel. I don’t think this is a retaliatory attack as Israel provoked Iran first and the “actual” retaliation is done by Iran not Israel.
Grabup (
talk) 05:19, 19 April 2024 (UTC)reply
As @
Bigfatman8766, said the attack is also targeted Iraq and Syria. I will suppor the alternative name given, “2024 Israeli strikes in Iran, Iraq and Syria” for now, if anyone came with better name then maybe I support it.
Grabup (
talk) 06:08, 19 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Support - As said, this is not the first retaliation and as such should not be biased to be the only retaliation which names such in the title. The title "2024 Israeli strikes in Iran" (or Isfahan) is far more neutral and does not put the blame on Iran for being the igniter of this retaliation chain.
Flemmish Nietzsche (
talk) 05:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC)reply
What about 2024 limited Israeli strikes on Iran? I think it sums it up good and blasts the conspiracy theorists?
Mujiwins (
talk) 15:37, 19 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Support for alternative As per
Bigfatman8766, the strikes is not only directed at Iran itself. 2024 Israeli strikes in Iran, Iraq and Syria will work best.
Yxuibs (
talk) 06:05, 19 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Support for 2024 Israeli strikes in Iran,Iraq and Syria , that name suits more as strikes were not only in Iran but also Babylon and Baghdad in Iraq and Daraa and Sudais in Syria as well
M Waleed (
talk) 06:28, 19 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Support as "retaliatory" in this article but not for the Iranian drone strikes implies that Iran did it unprovoked, which is false
GLORIOUSEXISTENCE (
talk) 07:46, 19 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Support for 2024 Israeli strikes in Iran,Iraq and Syria pretty much blankets and futureproofs article.
Fantastic Mr. Fox (
talk) 08:11, 19 April 2024 (UTC)reply
I've went ahead and removed "retaliatory" from the article name, because of the many requests to do so, and because it was clearly inconsistent with the other article name and against NPOV. –
Asarlaí(
talk) 08:56, 19 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment: Any Idea if there will be a name to the entire strike?
RΔ𝚉🌑R-𝕏 (
talk) 09:21, 19 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment anything but Isfahan. Kind of implies that they are an independent state.
Borgenland (
talk) 15:29, 19 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Support for alternative What about 2024 limited Israeli strikes on Iran? I think it sums it up good and blasts the conspiracy theorists?
Mujiwins (
talk) 15:35, 19 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Support for alternative What about 2024 limited Israeli strikes on Iran? I think it sums it up good and blasts the conspiracy theorists?
Mujiwins (
talk) 15:35, 19 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Change to 2024 Israeli airstrikes on Iran or 2024 Natanz airstrike. While this was initially reported as a drone strike. New reports from senior US officials indicate that this was an airstrike, launched by Israeli aircraft that fired missiles from outside Iran.[1]Ecrusized (
talk) 16:41, 19 April 2024 (UTC)reply
2024 Israeli airstrikes on Iran - is looking more factual and famous. Also it will be good if we see other targets, mentioned above Iraq and Syria.
Grabup (
talk) 17:31, 19 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Oppose Chaning "Iran" to "Isfahan" in the title is
WP:OVERPRECISION. There is only one such 2024 Israeli strike in Iran, so there is no need to specify the exact location.
Gödel2200 (
talk) 21:46, 19 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Oppose change to "2024 Israeli strikes in Isfahan", but "2024 Israeli strikes in Iran, Iraq and Syria" appears correct with what information is available at the present.--Surv1v4l1st╠
Talk║
Contribs╣ 22:17, 19 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep the article to what it currently is,
2024 Israeli strikes on Iran. It is not confirmed that Israel attacked Iran and Syria, unlike what I thought earlier.
Bigfatman8766 (
talk) 22:23, 19 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Oppose change to "2024 Israeli strikes in Isfahan" and keep it as
2024 Israeli strikes on Iran. Gödel2200 sums it up well - there is no need for such precision.
PhilKnight (
talk) 15:12, 20 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Oppose change to "2024 Israeli strikes in Isfahan". Keep it as 2024 Israeli strikes on Iran. --
Nicola Romani (
talk) 17:11, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Oppose Isfahan was not the only hit location.
Marokwitz (
talk) 19:38, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Oppose - The proposal to change the article name to "2024 Israeli strikes in Isfahan" is unnecessary and overly precise, given the broader scope of the events covered, which reportedly extend beyond Isfahan to other parts of Iran, Iraq, and Syria. Retaining a broader geographical descriptor in the article title, such as "2024 Israeli strikes in Iran, Iraq, and Syria," would more accurately reflect the distributed nature of these strikes and avoid the undue emphasis on Isfahan. It's essential for the title to reflect the geographic scope and the broader political and military context, ensuring the title remains relevant and accurate as additional information about these events may emerge.
FailedMusician (
talk) 00:54, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Oppose - there is no need to be so precise (which also has not been done for other recent airstrikes).
Hogo-2020 (
talk) 05:46, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Stron oppose unsupported by RS and ignores the fact that this was an attack by one state on another regardless of the geographic scope.
Makeandtoss (
talk) 11:01, 26 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I suggest we make a new article to cover the attack on Iraq's PMU base
This article is for the Israeli strikes on Iran on 19 April, not on Iraq on 20 April. I feel it's more appropriate to report it separately because it's two different countries and there's still no confirmation on who perpetrated the strikes whether the U.S. or Israel.
Also the attack on Iraq has been gaining media traction because an Iraqi PMU soldier was killed and many were injured.
RamHez (
talk) 07:17, 20 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Note, the references in the article make no mention that this airstrike was carrier out by Israel. While Israel is the probable suspect, this appears to be original research.
Ecrusized (
talk) 14:27, 20 April 2024 (UTC)reply
An earlier version of the Reuters article did mention Israel carried out the attack. I've tried using the Wayback Machine to look at a cached version of it, but only the earliest version seems to be available.
David O. Johnson (
talk) 18:36, 20 April 2024 (UTC)reply
I changed the wording of both mentions of the blast to say "allegedly" and added the CNN article that was mentioned, should no longer qualify as
WP:OR.
Flemmish Nietzsche (
talk) 18:43, 20 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Well another thing that I noticed is that IRI attacked Eilat, they do that often but this time they said it was in response to the attack on Baghdad PMF base
M Waleed (
talk) 03:46, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The "Requested move 19 April 2024" discussion shouldn't have been archived
Done. Unarchived and changed the auto-archiving settings for this page to be longer than one day. FacepalmSilverLocust💬 00:16, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
As far as I know, an explosion happened in Tabriz but the details are unclear, can someone add with appropriate citations.
M Waleed (
talk) 04:36, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply