deleted my warning from my misunderstanding

I believe you can clearly see that I was not involved. I did not see the vandalism (which I now have through looking at the edit of the revert of the vandalism) when I placed my edit - I glanced the article and saw that there was an unnecessary space between two references and removed the space. I apologize for any misunderstandings. GLORIOUSEXISTENCE ( talk) 06:24, 15 February 2024 (UTC) reply

WOOOowwwww! I'm so sorry. A similar thing just happened to me here! The abuse ate my diff. That wacko appeared and was reverted, neatly, while I was creating that edit. I didn't even notice it until later! This article tonight has had multiple wickedly sick phenomena that I haven't seen on Wikipedia in years! Salted! I just now did a whole flurry of counter-vandalism reports and repair on it, and I don't know how I misread the setup I'd quoted to you here. lol. I really analyze hard, especially at rare situations like this, so I am surprised I misread. Oops, sorry. — Smuckola (talk) 06:52, 15 February 2024 (UTC) reply

You have recently made edits related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. This is a standard message to inform you that the Arab–Israeli conflict is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Additionally, editors must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours per page for pages within this topic. Contentious topics are the successor to the former discretionary sanctions system, which you may be aware of. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. For a summary of difference between the former and new system, see WP:CTVSDS. Doug Weller talk 09:43, 1 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Hey, thanks for pitching in at Talk:Allegations of genocide in the 2023 Israeli attack on Gaza. More attention on the subject can help the community come to a reasonable decision. But I noticed the input you provided is based on your personal analysis of the subject. This type of input can be counterproductive, because consensus on Wikipedia should be based on reliable sources and policy-based arguments. In the case of a page move, arguments should be based on what the subject is explicitly called in reliable sources, not what individual editors understand or determine it to be. Personal interpretation or analysis is generally given little to no weight when determining the results of the discussion. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 21:58, 5 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, GLORIOUSEXISTENCE. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Stuart Seldowitz food cart incident, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 21:06, 27 April 2024 (UTC) reply