This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Stephen Harrison (October 26, 2023).
"Wikipedia Is Covering the War in Israel and Gaza Better Than X".
Slate. Retrieved November 1, 2023. ...academic Heather Ford has written about how the decision to title the Wikipedia article "2011 Egyptian revolution," as opposed to "2011 Egyptian protests," influenced how international media covered the conflict for years.
Ford, Heather (2022). Writing the revolution : Wikipedia and the survival of facts in the digital age. Cambridge, Massachusetts.
ISBN9780262046299.{{
cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (
link)
demographic composition of protesters, prison breaks, role of military in protests, global technological hacktivism, community self-organizing and self-defense, military-protester cooperation, electoral background from 2010 election, global political analysis (may have to happen at sub-articles), coptic reactions, takeover of embassy in Caracas (check edit history), nonviolence philosophy/training (CANVAS, Otpor, pamphlets, etc.), Breaking News
remove duplicate references where not needed. 2-3 max, unless contentious.
Section on Social Media is somewhat disorganized and the language could use some cleaning up. I will get to it eventually, but if anyone would like to tackle it first, be my guest.
Michaeltaft (
talk) 02:52, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
Social Media Section could be expanded to its own article. There is a huge story/background there, and it is well documented online.
Michaeltaft (
talk) 02:54, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
Add to this list or remove items when completed. If you dispute a proposed change, create a talk section to discuss
Text has been copied to or from this article; see the list below. The source pages now serve to
provide attribution for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted as long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below.
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.
"Lead Figures" and "Parties to the Civil Conflict" sections
Mohamed Morsi has been added to the "Lead figures" of the revolution section several times now, with no source or explanation given. The problem is that this article is about the revolution of 25/01-11/02, as it clearly states just above this section. Mohamed Morsi wasn't in any way a "lead figure" of this revolution, he became an important political figure far later. If someone wishes to make this claim I would expect that a reliable source is given, especially because of the [
policy] on living persons and the recently deceased. No explanation has been given so far on why this unsourced claim keeps being re-added, so I hope this section will encourage a discussion instead of simply reversing again. A few of the other names/groups listed are also questionable, I wish we could go through them all and just keep those for which a good RS is added. I've never heard of Saudi Arabia supporting the revolution, for example. Perhaps I'll work on it myself if I find the time, and I hope others could help out/chime in. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Azarqa (
talk •
contribs) 18:10, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Seeing as nobody has said anything to the contrary I've removed Morsi for the reasons mentioned above. Somebody else has removed Saudi Arabia. I'm also removing the
Freedom and Justice Party, as it was founded in April 2011 and as such could not have been involved between 25.01.-11.02. I've removed the
Egyptian Bloc (founded August 2011) and the
Al-Nour Party (founded May 2011) for the same reason. I plan to go through the rest of the people/groups to add citations or remove them. If I do I'll write about it here so please if you disagree with anything discuss here.
Azarqa (
talk) 05:37, 11 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Requested move 11 October 2021
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Support The list of revolutions
[1] follows the format presented by the nominator, which shows that moving the article would be consistent with other revolutions. --
Spekkios (
talk) 22:40, 19 October 2021 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by
PrimeBOT (
talk) on 16:34, 2 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Requested move 18 July 2023
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
correct according to what?—
blindlynx 21:35, 18 July 2023 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.