1995 India cyclone has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: January 12, 2016. ( Reviewed version). |
A fact from 1995 India cyclone appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 13 February 2016 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: 12george1 ( talk · contribs) 21:13, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Hurricanehink. I will be reviewing this article to check if it's worthy of being listed among Wikipedia's Good articles. After a brief skim through, the article looks decent. But let me give it a more detailed look now.-- 12george1 ( talk) 21:13, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
So it was a pretty decent article after all. Nothing real significant. I just have these six issues that I need you to fix or address in a timely manner before I can list this article as a Good Article.-- 12george1 ( talk) 21:13, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 1995 India cyclone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:50, 16 June 2017 (UTC)