This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
volcanoes,
volcanology,
igneous petrology, and
related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of
History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the
project page for details.
I feel like the sources aren't adequately discussed within the article. There is a lot of information in them not mentioned here that is interesting, and the article itself mentions part of the BBC article, namely the wedding of King Alfonso II of Naples, that I think are off topic. There needs to be more articles here, and both articles used are from 2017, meaning the information could be outdated. Is there any objection out there to the idea that this mystery eruption caused the weather changed in Europe around the time? If so, that should be represented as well.
Maddladd8011 (
talk) 17:09, 5 March 2021 (UTC)reply
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 14 January 2021 and 5 May 2021. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Maddladd8011. Peer reviewers:
SMotz3.
So, do the articles "1465 mystery eruption" and "1452/1453 mystery eruption" cover the same eruption with measurement uncertainties?
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk) 16:32, 1 March 2022 (UTC).reply
You made me do some research and the issue has been clarified. I do not think a merger is appropriate as the 1465 date is now believed to be due to low resolution dating, fails to correlate with tree ring record and so Ferris et als 2011 last used 1465 date was realigned by 2013 in the literature to 5 years less. Whatever we now know we are talking about two eruptions in separate hemispheres. The problem is what to do with the inaccurate title for this artice as this eruption took place in 1458 odd and we now have a resolution in time within months . I have corrected the 1452/53 article with references. ? redirect to 1458_mystery_eruption
The references to the two mystery volcanic eruptions that took place in the mid 1400s are.[1][2]