02:5302:53, 24 April 2024diffhist−457
Sarah Jane Baker
→After release: A charming title, but the video is useless as a source and the article linked doesn't mention a sign with that text, and the mention of the author's views appears to be synth, or rather is synthTags: Mobile editMobile web edit
20:4620:46, 17 April 2024diffhist−607
Daniel Ortega
The source needs to say more than "the USA supported one candidate" to say it was "marked by US interference"Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
18:0718:07, 15 April 2024diffhist−26
Zoë Quinn
While the blog post seems fictionalized, misleading, etc. I don't think it can be called defamatory without a legal ruling, or at least without being referred to as such in the article sourcesTags: Mobile editMobile web edit