For 98.216.249.147 talk block log logs filter log
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) ( 20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

11 April 2018

10 April 2018

9 April 2018

  • 21:55 21:55, 9 April 2018 diff hist −109 Neutron moderator →‎Moderation: Removed awkward "known as neutron slowing down". It's not "known as" that, it *is* that. Added phraseology to equate high speed with high KE. (actually it's high ''specific'' KE, but that distinction isn't so critical here)
  • 21:44 21:44, 9 April 2018 diff hist +1 Neutron moderator →‎Moderation: comma
  • 21:43 21:43, 9 April 2018 diff hist −55 Neutron moderator →‎Moderation: Uncited. Dubious because the right side had no term that increased with mass, and KE must be proportional to mass (or somehow the "amount of stuff"), as it is on the left side. Are we talking about *specific* energy here? --in which case the fix might be to remove the m from the left side. That Kb is Boltzmann constant is obvious to non-laity, but not clear to lay readers. Regardless, it still needs a citation to be replaced.

8 April 2018

6 April 2018

5 April 2018

3 April 2018

2 April 2018

  • 16:59 16:59, 2 April 2018 diff hist −21 GNU Zebra →‎Background: Link was not apt. Maybe it was supposed to be an *example* of an "IP Infusion" company, but that was unclear, and links don't typically go to examples anyway.
  • 16:51 16:51, 2 April 2018 diff hist −26 Access (company)Reduced a little bit of the large promotional tone. Also not covered in citation.
  • 07:49 07:49, 2 April 2018 diff hist −16 His Master's Voice"sound carriers"? Changed to colloquial/non-jargon "recordings". Actually, the most colloquial would be "records", but that sometimes implies vinyl.
  • 06:49 06:49, 2 April 2018 diff hist +1 User talk:98.216.249.147Undid a very strange, very immaterial imposition of minor format preference on a unimportant user talk page made totally out of the blue. How could such a thing could be of the slightest concern to the modifier, or to anybody? Could it have been to provoke an unreasonable response? If my response is unreasonable, how about we just forget about it anyway and let it be, okay? A well-known editor expending reputation on such a thing would be a sorrier loss than a quirky IP doing the same. :-) Tag: Undo

31 March 2018

29 March 2018

27 March 2018

26 March 2018

25 March 2018

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) ( 20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)