22:1422:14, 26 August 2023diffhist+314
Pistolet modèle 1733
Renaming of "Variants" to "Gallery." Made a mention that the pistols were reissued following the failure of the 1777/1786 Pattern Pistol.
22:0822:08, 26 August 2023diffhist+205
Pistolet modèle 1733
Neither of the Pistols in the Gallery are of the 1763/1766 Pattern. They are of the previous 1733 Pattern. Added the An IX Photo, a nearly indistinguishable lookalike.
21:5721:57, 26 August 2023diffhist+119
Pistolet modèle 1786
A few more small changes related to the year for cavalry and army introduction, a bit of grammar changes for the modifications changed paragraph and some small details on why it was initially liked over previous patterns.
12:3412:34, 12 October 2022diffhist+495
Yamato-class battleship
→Design: Realized that these toinnage numbers are incorrectly referenced in long tons, the Japanese measured in metric tons. Correcting also inconsistency of use of numbers between spelled out and arabic shorthand.
01:0901:09, 12 October 2022diffhist+9,591
Yamato-class battleship
→Design: Added Back my Initial Edits to the Design Section with proper citations to the book that was behind the original article linked. Some information has changed due to a better understanding of how the A-150 Class priorities changed to become a Improvement to the Yamato Class before the Project's Cancellation. PART 1
03:1603:16, 8 October 2022diffhist+9,904
Design A-150 battleship
Undid revision 1114714033 by
Nigel Ish (
talk) Unacceptable. I did 5 days of independent research on this subject to improve this article beyond what was there. Your sources for this article are hopelessly out of date and full of holes and inconsistencies. My edits and the proposed changes by a user before you reverted it contain much more detail and more definitive info on this class. "Reliable sources" be damned if they arent accurateTags: UndoReverted