08:5208:52, 23 January 2009diffhist+3
Japanophilia
I changed my mind. The article"
ja:親日" is a worthless article. Entirely subjective. It is better to read the article"
ja:親日派" despite it was written by a point of Korean's view.
07:2907:29, 23 January 2009diffhist−3
Japanophilia
The article"親日派" is very salanted. It was written by a point of Korean's view despite it is the Japanese editon. Japane word"親日派"equal to "Japanophile". Korean word"親日派"equal to "
Chinilpa".