Karl Marx and other early communist theorists believed that
hunter-gatherer societies as were found in the
Paleolithic through to
horticultural societies as found in the
Chalcolithic were essentially egalitarian[5][6] and he, therefore, termed their ideology to be
primitive communism.[7] Since Marx, sociologists and archaeologists have developed the idea of and research on primitive communism.[8][9] According to
Harry W. Laidler, one of the first writers to espouse a belief in the primitive communism of the past was the
RomanStoic philosopher
Seneca who stated, "How happy was the primitive age when the bounties of nature lay in common...They held all nature in common which gave them secure possession of the public wealth."[10] Because of this he believed that such primitive societies were the richest as there was no poverty.[10] According to Erik van Ree, other
Greco-Roman writers that expressed a belief in a prehistoric humanity that had a communist-like societal structure include
Diodorus Siculus,
Virgil, and
Ovid.[11]
It has been argued that the
Indus Valley civilisation is an example of a
primitive communist society, due to its perceived lack of conflict and social hierarchies.[13] Others argue that such an assessment of the Indus Valley civilisation is not correct.[why?][14][15]
The idea of a classless and stateless society based on communal ownership of property and wealth also stretches far back in Western thought long before The Communist Manifesto. There are scholars who have traced communist ideas back to ancient times, particularly in the work of
Pythagoras and
Plato.[17][18] Followers of Pythagoras, for instance, lived in one building and held their property in common because the philosopher taught the absolute equality of property with all worldly possessions being brought into a common store.[19]
It is argued that Plato's Republic described in great detail a communist-dominated society wherein power is delegated in the hands of intelligent philosopher or military guardian class and rejected the concept of family and private property.[20][21][22] In a social order divided into warrior-kings and the Homeric demos of craftsmen and peasants, Plato conceived an ideal Greek city-state without any form of capitalism and commercialism with business enterprise, political plurality, and working-class unrest considered as evils that must be abolished.[23] While Plato's vision cannot be considered a precursor of communist thinking, his utopian speculations are shared by other utopian thinkers later on.[24] An important feature that distinguishes Plato's ideal society in the Republic is that the ban on private property applies only to the superior classes (rulers and warriors), not to the general public.[25]
The early
Church Fathers, like their non-
Abrahamic predecessors, maintained that human society had declined to its current state from a now lost egalitarian social order.[28] There are those who view that the early Christian Church, such as that one described in the
Acts of the Apostles (specifically
Acts 2:44–45 and
Acts 4:32–45)[29][28][30] was an early form of communism.[31][32][33] The view is that communism was just
Christianity in practice and
Jesus Christ was himself a communist.[34] This link was highlighted in one of Marx's early writings which stated: "As Christ is the intermediary unto whom man unburdens all his divinity, all his religious bonds, so the state is the mediator unto which he transfers all his Godlessness, all his human liberty".[34] Furthermore, the Marxist ethos that aims for unity reflects the
Christian universalist teaching that humankind is one and that there is only one god who does not discriminate among people.[35] Later historians have supported the reading of early church communities as communistic in structure.[36][37][38]
Pre-Marxist communism was also present in the attempts to establish communistic societies such as those made by the ancient Jewish sects the
Essenes[39][40][41] and by the Judean desert sect.[clarification needed][42]
Post-classical history
Europe
Peter Kropotkin argued that the elements of mutual aid and mutual defense expressed in the
medieval commune of the
Middle Ages and its guild system were the same sentiments of collective self-defense apparent in modern anarchism, communism and socialism.[43] From the
High Middle Ages in Europe, various groups supporting
Christian communist and
communalist ideas were occasionally adopted by reformist Christian sects. An early 12th century
proto-Protestant group originating in
Lyon known as the
Waldensians held their property in common in accordance with the Book of Acts, but were persecuted by the Catholic Church and retreated to
Piedmont.[44] Around 1300 the
Apostolic Brethren in northern Italy were taken over by
Fra Dolcino who formed a sect known as the
Dulcinians which advocated ending feudalism, dissolving hierarchies in the church, and holding all property in common.[44] The
Peasants' Revolt in England has been an inspiration for "the medieval ideal of primitive communism", with the priest
John Ball of the revolt being an inspirational figure to later revolutionaries[45] and having allegedly declared, "things cannot go well in England, nor ever will, until all goods are held in common."[46]
The
Chachapoya culture indicated an egalitarian non-hierarchical society through a lack of archaeological evidence and a lack of power expressing architecture that would be expected for societal leaders such as royalty or aristocracy.[47]
Asia
Mazdak, a
Sasanian prophet who founded the eponymous
Zoroastrian offshoot of
Mazdakism, is argued by various historical sources, including
Muhammad Iqbal, to have been a proto-communist. This view originates from Mazdak's belief in the abolition of private property,[48] advocacy of social revolution, and criticism of the clergy.
Researchers have commented on the communistic nature of the society built by the
Qarmatians[49] around
Al-Ahsa from the 9th to 10th centuries.[50][51][52]
In the 16th century, English writer Sir
Thomas More portrayed a society based on common ownership of property in his treatise Utopia, whose leaders administered it through the application of reason.[57] Several groupings in the
English Civil War supported this idea, but especially the
Diggers[58] who espoused communistic and
agrarian ideals.[59]Oliver Cromwell and the
Grandees' attitude to these groups was at best ambivalent and often hostile.[60] Engels considered the
Levellers of the English Civil War as a group representing the proletariat fighting for a
utopian socialist society.[61] Though later commentators have viewed the Levellers as a bourgeois group that did not seek a socialist society.[62][63]
During the
Age of Enlightenment in 18th century France, some liberal writers increasingly began to criticize the institution of
private property even to the extent they demanded its abolition.[64] Such writings came from thinkers such as the deeply religious philosopher
Jean-Jacques Rousseau.[65] In his hugely influential The Social Contract (1762) Rousseau outlined the basis for a political order based on popular sovereignty rather than the rule of monarchs, and in his Discourse on Inequality (1755) inveighed against the corrupting effects of private property claiming that the invention of private property had led to the," crimes, wars, murders, and suffering" that plagued civilization.[66][67] Raised a
Calvinist, Rousseau was influenced by the
Jansenist movement within the
Roman Catholic Church. The Jansenist movement originated from the most orthodox Roman Catholic bishops who tried to reform the Roman Catholic Church in the 17th century to stop
secularization and
Protestantism. One of the main Jansenist aims was democratizing to stop the aristocratic corruption at the top of the Church hierarchy.[68][page needed]
Victor d'Hupay's 1779 work Project for a Philosophical Community described a plan for a communal experiment in Marseille where all private property was banned.[69][70] d'Hupay referred to himself as a communiste, the French form of the word "communist", in a 1782 letter, the first recorded instance of that term.[69]
Lewis Henry Morgan's descriptions of "communism in living" as practiced by the
Haudenosaunee of North America, through research enabled by and coauthored with
Ely S. Parker, were viewed as a form of pre-Marxist communism.[71] Morgan's works were a primary inspiration for Marx and Engel's description of primitive communism,[72] and has led to some believing that early communist-like societies also existed outside of Europe, in
Native American society and other pre-
Colonized societies in the Western hemisphere. Though the belief of primitive communism as based on Morgan's work is flawed[73] due to Morgan's misunderstandings of Haudenosaunee society and his, since proven wrong,
theory of social evolution.[74] This, and subsequent more accurate research, has led to the society of the Haudenosaunee to be of interest in communist and anarchist analysis.[75][76] Particularly aspects where land was not treated as a commodity,[77] communal ownership[78][79] and near non-existent rates of crime.[78][79][80]
Primitive communism meaning societies that practiced economic cooperation among the members of their community,[81] where almost every member of a community had their own contribution to society and land and natural resources would often be shared peacefully among the community. Some such communities in North America and South America still existed well into the 20th century. Historian Barry Pritzker lists the
Acoma,
Cochiti and
IsletaPuebloans as living in socialist-like societies.[82] It is assumed modern egalitarianism seen in Pueblo communities stems from this historic socio-economic structure.[5]David Graeber has also commented that the
Inuit have practiced communism and fended off
unjust hierarchy for "thousands of years".[83]
Age of Revolution
The
Shakers of the 18th century under Joseph Meacham developed and practiced their own form of
communalism, as a sort of
religious communism, where property had been made a "consecrated whole" in each Shaker community.[84]
The currents of thought in
French philosophy from the Enlightenment from Rousseau and d'Hupay proved influential during the
French Revolution of 1789 in which various anti-monarchists, particularly the
Jacobins,[94] supported the idea of redistributing wealth equally among the people, including
Jean-Paul Marat and
Francois Babeuf.[95] The latter was involved in the
Conspiracy of the Equals of 1796 intending to establish a revolutionary regime based on communal ownership, egalitarianism and the redistribution of property.[96] Babeuf was directly influenced by Morelly's anti-property utopian novel The Code of Nature and quoted it extensively, although he was under the erroneous impression it was written by
Diderot.[97] Also during the revolution the publisher
Nicholas Bonneville, the founder of the Parisian revolutionary
Social Club used his printing press to spread the communist treatises of Restif and
Sylvain Maréchal.[98] Maréchal, who later joined Babeuf's conspiracy, would state it his Manifesto of the Equals (1796), "we aim at something more sublime and more just, the COMMON GOOD or the COMMUNITY OF GOODS" and "The French Revolution is just a precursor of another revolution, far greater, far more solemn, which will be the last."[99] Restif also continued to write and publish books on the topic of communism throughout the Revolution.[100] Accordingly, through their egalitarian programs and agitation Restif, Maréchal, and Babeuf became the progenitors of modern communism.[101] Babeuf's plot was detected, however, and he and several others involved were arrested and executed. Because of his views and methods, Babeuf has been described as an anarchist, communist and a socialist by later scholars.[102][103][104] The word "communism" was first used in English by
Goodwyn Barmby in a conversation with those he described as the "disciples of Babeuf".[105] Despite the setback of the loss of Babeuf, the example of the
French Revolutionary regime and Babeuf's doomed insurrection was an inspiration for French socialist thinkers such as
Henri de Saint-Simon,
Louis Blanc,
Charles Fourier and
Pierre-Joseph Proudhon.[39] Proudhon, the founder of modern anarchism and libertarian socialism would later famously declare "
property is theft!" a phrase first invented by the French revolutionary
Brissot de Warville.[106]
Maximilien Robespierre and his
Reign of Terror, aimed at exterminating the monarchy, nobility, clergy, conservatives and nationalists was admired among some anarchists, communists and socialists.[107] In his turn, Robespierre was a great admirer of Voltaire and Rousseau.[108]
By the 1830s and 1840s in France, the egalitarian concepts of communism and the related ideas of
socialism had become widely popular in revolutionary circles thanks to the writings of social critics and philosophers such as Pierre Leroux[109] and
Théodore Dézamy, whose critiques of bourgeoisie
liberalism and
individualism led to a widespread intellectual rejection of laissez-fairecapitalism on economic, philosophical and moral grounds.[110] According to Leroux writing in 1832, "To recognise no other aim than individualism is to deliver the lower classes to brutal exploitation. The proletariat is no more than a revival of antique slavery." He also asserted that private ownership of the means of production allowed for the exploitation of the lower classes and that private property was a concept divorced from human dignity.[110] It was only in the year 1840 that proponents of common ownership in France, including the socialists Théodore Dézamy, Étienne Cabet, and
Jean-Jacques Pillot began to widely adopt the word "communism" as a term for their belief system.[111] Those inspired by Étienne Cabet created the
Icarian movement setting up communities based on non-religious communal ownership in various states across the US, the last of these communities located a few miles outside
Corning, Iowa, disbanded voluntarily in 1898.[112]
Marx saw communism as the original state of mankind from which it rose through
classical society and then
feudalism to its current state of
capitalism. He proposed that the next step in social evolution would be a return to
communism.[116][117]
In its contemporary form,
communism grew out of the
workers' movement of 19th-century Europe.[118][119] As the
Industrial Revolution advanced, socialist critics blamed
capitalism for creating a class of poor, urban factory workers who toiled under harsh conditions and for widening the gulf between rich and poor.[117]
^Musée de Préhistoire Terra Amata.
"Le site acheuléen de Terra Amata" [The Acheulean site of Terra Amata]. Musée de Préhistoire Terra Amata (in French). Retrieved 10 June 2022.
^van Ree (2015), p. 17: "Diodorus Siculus, Virgil, Ovid, Seneca and others believed that property was originally held in common, and that private property was a late and unfortunate development."
^Cork, Edward (2005). "Peaceful Harappans? Reviewing the evidence for the absence of warfare in the Indus Civilisation of north-west India and Pakistan (c. 2500-1900 BC)". Antiquity. 79 (304): 411–423.
doi:
10.1017/S0003598X0011419X.
S2CID160617108.
^Ensign, Russell; Patsouras, Louis (1993). Challenging Social Injustice: Essays on Socialism and the Devaluation of the Human Spirit.
The Edwin Mellen Press. p. 2.
ISBN0773493697.
^Walton, Steve (April 2008). "Primitive communism in Acts? Does Acts present the community of goods (2:44-45; 4:32-35) as mistaken?". Evangelical Quarterly. 80 (2): 99–111.
doi:
10.1163/27725472-08002001.
^
abHoulden, Leslie; Minard, Antone (2015). Jesus in History, Legend, Scripture, and Tradition: A World Encyclopedia: A World Encyclopedia. Santa Barbara, CA:
ABC-CLIO. p. 357.
ISBN9781610698047.
^Darmangeat, Christophe (2009). Le Communisme primitif n'est plus ce qu'il était [Primitive Communism is not what it used to be] (in French). Collectif d'édition Smolny.
Ball, Terence (2011). "Communism". In Kurian, George Thomas; Alt, James E.; Chambers, Simone; Garrett, Geoffrey; Levi, Margaret; McClain, Paula D. (eds.). The Encyclopedia of Political Science.
CQ Press. pp. 284–285.
ISBN978-1-933116-44-0.
Winstanley, Gerrard (2002) [1649].
The True Levellers Standard ADVANCED: or, The State of Community opened, and Presented to the Sons of Men. R.S. Bear. That we may work in righteousness, and lay the Foundation of making the Earth a Common Treasury for All, both Rich and Poor, That every one that is born in the Land, may be fed by the Earth his Mother that brought him forth, according to the Reason that rules in the Creation. Not Inclosing any part into any particular hand, but all as one man, working together, and feeding together as Sons of one Father, members of one Family; not one Lording over another, but all looking upon each other, as equals in the Creation.
Yang, Manuel (September 2012). "Specter of the commons: Karl Marx, Lewis Henry Morgan, and nineteenth-century European stadialism". Borderlands. 11 (2).
Gale Academic OneFile.