Gap junctions are one of three broad categories of
intercellular connections that form between a multitude of animal
cell types.[1][2] First photographed around 1952,[3][4] it wasn't until 1969 that gap junctions were referred to as gap junctions.[5] Named after the 2-4 nm gap they bridged between cell membranes, they had been characterised in more detail by 1967.[6]
Within a gap junction reside protein complexes (referred initially to as globules, observed to connect one cell to another) and
vesicles within a cell to the outer cell membrane.[7] By 1974 one of the major gap junction proteins was dubbed a
connexin,[8][9] and six connexins were observed to form a channel called a
connexon due to the connections connexon pairs made between cells. The initial discovery of gap junctions in nerve cells lent credence to their function in transmission of electrical impulses. Experimental confirmation followed, with
molecules,
ions, and electrical impulses being shown to pass through the connexons; this proved them to be a generalized regulated gate between cells in gap junctions. A type of hemichannel connexon also forms channels to the extracellular regions as well.[10][11][12][13]
More than 26 different connexins are known to comprise gap junctions in various different tissues; there are at least 12 other components[14] that form the specialized area of membrane called the gap junction complex. These components include the tight junction protein
ZO-1 that holds the membranes close together,[15]sodium channels,[16] and
aquaporin.[17][18]
The increasing ability to sequence the DNA of organisms also led to an increase in the complexity of the gap junction family of proteins. The term connexin was used to describe the gap junction proteins connecting two cells with pores. Sequencing of these pore proteins showed them to be structurally similar between vertebrates and invertebrates but different in sequence.[19] As a result, the term
innexin was used to differentiate invertebrate connexins from vertebrate ones.[20] While the sequencing of invertebrate species is far less complete than for vertebrates, more than 20 innexins have already been uncovered,[21] along with unnexins in parasites and
vinnexins in viruses.
A gap junction is less frequently called a nexus or macula communicans. While an
ephapse, like a gap junction, also involves the transmission of electrical signals, the two are distinct from each other. Ephaptic coupling involves electrical signals external to the cells. Ephapses are often studied in the context of electrically induced
potentials propagated among groups of nerve cell membranes, even in the absence of gap junction communication, with no discrete subcellular structures known.[22][23] Unlike gap junctions, no specific structure related to an ephapse has yet been described, so the process is often referred to as ephaptic coupling rather than as an ephapse.
Invertebrate gap junctions comprise
proteins from the
innexinfamily. Innexins have no significant sequence
homology with connexins.[24] Though differing in sequence to connexins, innexins are similar enough to connexins to state that innexins form gap junctions in vivo in the same way connexins do.[25][26][27]
The more recently characterized
pannexin family,[28] which was originally thought to form intercellular channels (with an
amino acid sequence similar to innexins[29]) in fact functions as a single-membrane channel that communicates with the extracellular environment and has been shown to pass calcium and
ATP.[30] This has led to the idea that pannexins may not form intercellular junctions in the same way connexins and innexins do and therefore should not use the same hemi-channel/channel naming.[31] Others have presented evidence based on genetic sequencing and overall functioning in tissues that pannexins should still be considered part of the gap junction family of proteins despite structural differences. They also take into account that there are still more groups of connexin
orthologs to be discovered.[32]
At gap junctions, the intercellular space is 2-4 nm.[33] Hemichannels in the membrane of each cell are aligned with one another.[34]
Gap junction channels formed from two identical hemichannels are called homotypic, while those with differing hemichannels are heterotypic. In turn, hemichannels of uniform protein composition are called
homomeric, while those with differing proteins are
heteromeric. Channel composition influences the function of gap junction channels, and different connexins will not necessarily form heterotypic with all others.[35]
Before innexins and connexins were well characterized, the genes coding for the connexin gap junction channels were classified in one of three groups (A, B and C; for example, GJA1, GJC1), based on gene mapping and
sequence similarity.[36][37][38] However, connexin genes do not code directly for the expression of gap junction channels; genes can produce only the proteins that make up gap junction channels. An alternative naming system based on the protein's molecular weight is the most widely used (for example, connexin43=GJA1, connexin30.3=GJB4).
Levels of organization
In vertebrates, two pairs of six connexin proteins form a connexon. In invertebrates, six innexin proteins form an innexon. Otherwise, the structures are similar. The term hemichannel used in this description refers to half a gap junction channel.
The connexin genes (DNA) are transcribed to RNA, which is then translated to produce a connexin.
Six connexin proteins create one connexon channel (hemichannel). When identical connexin proteins join to form one connexon, it is called a homomeric connexon. When different connexin proteins join to form one connexon, it is called a heteromeric connexon.
Two connexons, joined across a cell membrane, comprise a Gap Junction channel. When two identical connexons come together to form a Gap junction channel, it is called a homotypic channel. When one homomeric connexon and one heteromeric connexon come together, it is called a heterotypic gap junction channel. When two heteromeric connexons join, it is also called a heterotypic gap junction channel.
Tens to thousands of gap junction channels cluster in areas to enable connexon pairs to form.[40] The macromolecular complex is called a gap junction plaque. Molecules other than connexins are involved in gap junction plaques including zonula occludens-1 (
ZO-1) and
sodium channels.[15][16]
Properties of connexon pairs
A connexon or innexon channel pair:
Allows for direct electrical communication between cells, although different hemichannel subunits can impart different single channel
conductances, from about 30
pS to 500 pS.
Allows for chemical communication between cells through the transmission of small
second messengers, such as inositol triphosphate (IP 3) and calcium (Ca2+ ),[42] although different hemichannel subunits can impart different selectivities for particular molecules.
Generally allows transmembrane movement of molecules smaller than 485
daltons[43] (1,100 daltons through invertebrate gap junctions[44]), although different hemichannel subunits may impart different pore sizes and different charge selectivity. Large biomolecules, including
nucleic acids and
proteins, are precluded from cytoplasmic transfer between cells through gap junction hemichannel pairs.
Ensures that molecules and current passing through the gap junction do not leak into the intercellular space.
Properties of connexons as hemichannels
Unpaired connexons or innexons can act as hemichannels in a single membrane, allowing the cell to exchange molecules directly with the exterior of the cell. It has been shown that connexons would be available to do this prior to being incorporated into the gap junction plaques.[40] Some of the properties of these unpaired connexons are listed below:
Pore or transmembrane channel size is highly variable, in the range of approximately 8-20Å in diameter.[45]
They connect the cytoplasm of the cell to the cell exterior and are thought to be in a closed state by default in order to prevent leakage from the cell.[46][47]
Some connexons respond to external factors by opening up. Mechanical shear and various diseases can cause this to happen.[48]
Establishing further connexon properties different to those of connexon pairs proves difficult due to separating their effects experimentally in organisms.[48]
Occurrence and distribution
Gap Junctions have been observed in various animal organs and tissues where cells contact each other. From the 1950s to 1970s they were detected in:
Human islet of Langerhans,[49] myometrium,[50] and eye lens[51]
Rat pancreas, liver, adrenal cortex, epididymis, duodenum, muscle,[52] and seminiferous tubules[53]
Since the 1970s, gap junctions have continued to be found in nearly all animal cells that touch each other. By the 1990s new technology such as
confocal microscopy allowed more rapid survey of large areas of tissue. Since the 1970s tissues that were traditionally considered to have isolated cells (such as bone) were shown to have cells that were still connected with gap junctions, however tenuously.[71] Gap junctions appear to be in all animal organs and tissues; there have been no exceptions to this other than cells not normally in contact with neighboring cells. Adult skeletal muscle is a possible exception. If present in skeletal muscle, gap junctions may propagate contractions in an arbitrary way through cells making up the muscle. In some cases this may not be the case, as shown in other muscle types that do have gap junctions.[72] An indication of what results from reduction or absence of gap junctions may be found by analyses of cancers[73][74][75] or the aging process.[76]
Since the discovery of innexins, pannexins and unnexins, gaps in our knowledge of
intercellular communication are becoming more defined. Innexins look and behave similarly to connexins and can be seen to fill a similar role to connexins in invertebrates. Pannexins also look individually similar to connexins; unlike connexins, they do not appear to easily form gap junctions. Connexins have been found in only vertebrata and tunicata of over 20 different major metazoan groups. Innexins and pannexins are far more widespread including innexin homologues in vertebrates.[77][78] The unicellular
Trypanosomatidae parasites presumably have unnexin genes to aid in their infection of animals including humans.[79] The even smaller
adenovirus has its own vinnexin,[80] apparently derived from an innexin, to aid its transmission between the virus's hosts.
As we learn more, the term gap junction cannot be defined by a single protein such as a connexin. The term appears to be an accurate description of the regular intercellular gap as it was originally coined for rather than a junction defined by a single family of proteins. One example of this includes the gap junction-like structures found in
sponges, despite them not having pannexins. While we are still at the early stages of understanding the nervous system of a sponge[81] the gap junctions of sponges may as yet indicate intercellular communications pathways.[82][83]
In a more general sense, gap junctions may be seen to function at the simplest level as a direct cell to cell pathway for electrical currents, small molecules and ions. The control of this communication allows complex downstream effects on multicellular organisms.
Embryonic, organ and tissue development
In the 1980s, more subtle roles of gap junctions in communication have been investigated. It was discovered that gap junction communication could be disrupted by adding anti-connexin antibodies into embryonic cells.[84][85] Embryos with areas of blocked gap junctions failed to develop normally. The mechanism by which antibodies blocked the gap junctions was unclear; systematic studies were undertaken to elucidate the mechanism.[86][87] Refinement of these studies suggested that gap junctions were key in the development of cell polarity[88] and the left-right symmetry in animals.[89][90] While signaling that determines the position of body organs appears to rely on gap junctions, so does the more fundamental differentiation of cells at later stages of embryonic development.[91][92][93][94][95]
Gap junctions were found to be responsible for the transmission of signals required for drugs to have an effect.[96] Conversely, some drugs were shown to block gap junction channels.[97]
The bystander effect and disease
Cell death
The bystander effect has its connotations of the innocent bystander being killed. When cells are dying or compromised due to disease or injury, messages are transmitted to neighboring cells by gap junctions. This can cause otherwise healthy bystander cells to also die.[98] The bystander effect is, therefore, important to consider in diseased cells, opening an avenue for more funding and a flourish of research.[99][100][101][102][103][104][105][106][107]
The bystander effect was later researched with regard to cells damaged by radiation or mechanical injury and in turn wound healing.[108][109][110][111][112] Disease seems to have an effect on the ability of gap junctions to fulfill their roles in wound healing.[113][114] The oral administration of gap junction blockers to reduce the symptoms of disease in remote parts of the body is slowly becoming a reality.[115]
Tissue restructuring
While there has been a tendency to focus on the bystander effect in disease due to the possibility of therapeutic avenues, there is evidence that there is a more central role in normal development of tissues. Death of some cells and their surrounding matrix may be required for a tissue to reach its final configuration; gap junctions appear essential to this process.[116][117] There are also more complex studies that try to combine our understanding of the simultaneous roles of gap junctions in both wound healing and tissue development.[118][119][120]
Disease
Mutations in connexins have been associated with many diseases in humans, including
deafness, heart
atrial fibrillation (standstill) and
cataracts. The study of these mutations has helped clarify some of the functions of connexins.[121][122]
Hemichannels are thought to play a general role in the progression and severity of many diseases; this is in part due to hemichannels being an open door to the outside of each cell.[48]
Areas of electrical coupling
Gap junctions electrically and chemically couple cells throughout the body of most animals. Electrical coupling can be relatively fast acting and can be used over short distances within an organism. Tissues in this section have well known functions observed to be coordinated by gap junctions, with intercellular signaling happening in time frames of microseconds or less.
Heart
Gap junctions are particularly important in
cardiac muscle: the signal to contract is passed efficiently through gap junctions, allowing the heart muscle cells to contract in unison. The importance is emphasized by a secondary ephaptic pathway for the signal to contract also being associated with the gap junction plaques. This redundancy in signal transmission associated with gap junction plaques is the first to be described and involves sodium channels rather than connexins.[16][123]
Eye lens
Precise control of light refraction, structural dimensions and transparency are key aspects of the eye lens structure that allow focusing by the eye. Transparency is aided by the absence of nerves and blood vessels from the lens, so gap junctions are left with a larger loading of intercellular communication than in other tissues reflected in large numbers of gap junctions. The
crystallinity of the lens also means the cells and gap junctions are well ordered for systematic mapping of where the gap junction plaques are. As no cells are lost from the lens interior during the life of the animal, a complete map of the gap junctions is possible.[124]
The associated figure shows how the size, shape, and frequency of gap junction plaques change with cell growth. With growth, fiber cells are progressively isolated from more direct metabolite exchange with the
aqueous humor through the capsule and lens epithelium. The isolation correlates with the classical circular shape of larger plaques shown in the yellow zone being disrupted. Changing the fiber cells' morphology requires the movements of vesicles through the gap junction plaques at higher frequencies in this area.[125]
Connexin proteins expressed in neuronal gap junctions include m
CX36, mCX57, and m
CX45, with mRNAs for at least five other connexins (m
Cx26, m
Cx30.2, m
Cx32, m
Cx43, m
Cx47) detected but without immunocytochemical evidence for the corresponding protein within ultrastructurally-defined gap junctions. Those mRNAs appear to be downregulated or destroyed by micro interfering RNAs (
miRNAs) that are cell-type and cell-lineage specific.
Retina
Neurons within the
retina show extensive coupling, both within populations of one cell type and between different cell types.[128]
Uterus
The
uterine muscle (
myometrium) remains in a quiescent relaxed state during
pregnancy to maintain
fetal development. Immediately preceding
labor, the myometrium transforms into an activated contractile unit by increasing expression of
connexin-43 (
CX43, a.k.a. Gap Junction Alpha-1 protein,
GJA1) facilitating gap junction (GJ) formation between individual myometrial cells. Importantly, the formation of GJs promotes communication between neighbouring
myocytes, which facilitates the transfer of small molecules such as secondary messengers, metabolites, and small ions for electrical coupling. Consistent with all species, uterine myometrial contractions propagate from spontaneous
action potentials as a result of sudden change in
plasma membrane permeability. This leads to an increase of intracellular
Ca²⁺ concentration, facilitating action potential propagation through electrically coupled cells.[129] It has more recently been discovered that uterine
macrophages directly physically couples with uterine myocytes through CX43, transferring Ca²⁺, to promote uterine muscle contraction and excitation during labor onset.[130]
Hemichannel function
Lens epithelial cells with gap junctions and hemichannels at the interface with fiber cells.
Lens fiber cells ends with gap junctions and hemichannels at the interface with fiber cells.
Hemichannels contribute to a cellular network of gap junctions and allow the release of
ATP,
glutamate,
NAD+, and
prostaglandin E2 from cells, which can all act as messengers to cells otherwise disconnected from such messaging.[131] In this sense, a gap junction plaque forms a one-to-one relationship with the neighboring cell, daisy chaining many cells together. Hemichannels form a one to many relationship with the surrounding tissue.
On a larger scale, the one-to-many communication of cells is typically carried out by the vascular and nervous systems. This makes detecting the contribution of hemichannels to extracellular communication more difficult in whole organisms. With the eye lens, the vascular and nervous systems are absent, making reliance on hemichannels greater and their detection easier. At the interface of the lens with the aqueous humor (where the lens exchanges metabolites), both gap junction plaques and more diffused connexon distribution can be seen in the accompanying micrographs.
Discovery
Form to function
Well before the demonstration of the gap in gap junctions, they were seen at the junction of neighboring nerve cells. The close proximity of the neighboring cell membranes at the gap junction led researchers to speculate that they had a role in intercellular communication, in particular the transmission of electrical signals.[61][132][133] Gap junctions were also proven to be electrically rectifying and referred to as an
electrical synapse.[134][135] Later, it was found that chemicals could also be transported between cells through gap junctions.[136]
Implicit or explicit in most of the early studies is that the area of the gap junction was different in structure to the surrounding membranes in a way that made it look different. The gap junction had been shown to create a micro-environment between the two cells in the extracellular space or gap. This portion of extracellular space was somewhat isolated from the surrounding space and also bridged by what we now call connexon pairs, which form even more tightly sealed bridges that cross the gap junction gap between two cells. When viewed in the plane of the membrane by freeze-fracture techniques, higher-resolution distribution of connexons within the gap junction plaque is possible.[137]
Connexin free islands are observed in some junctions. The observation was largely without explanation until vesicles were shown by Peracchia using
transmission electron microscopy (TEM) thin sections to be systematically associated with gap junction plaques.[138] Peracchia's study was probably also the first study to describe paired connexon structures, which he called a globule. Studies showing vesicles associated with gap junctions and proposing the vesicle contents may move across the junction plaques between two cells were rare, as most studies focused on connexons rather than vesicles. A later study using a combination of microscopy techniques confirmed the early evidence of a probable function for gap junctions in intercellular vesicle transfer. Areas of vesicle transfer were associated with connexin free islands within gap junction plaques.[125] Connexin 43 has been shown to be necessary for the transfer of whole mitochondrias to neighboring cells, though whether the mitochondria is transferred directly through the membrane or within a vesicle has not been determined [139]
Electrical and chemical nerve synapses
Because of the widespread occurrence of gap junctions in cell types other than nerve cells, the term gap junction became more generally used than terms such as electrical synapse or nexus. Another dimension in the relationship between nerve cells and gap junctions was revealed by studying chemical synapse formation and gap junction presence. By tracing nerve development in leeches with gap junction expression suppressed it was shown that the bidirectional gap junction (electrical nerve synapse) needs to form between two cells before they can grow to form a unidirectional chemical nerve synapse.[140] The chemical nerve synapse is the synapse most often truncated to the more ambiguous term nerve synapse.
Composition
Connexins
The purification[141][142] of the intercellular gap junction plaques enriched in the channel forming protein (
connexin) showed a protein forming hexagonal arrays in
x-ray diffraction. Because of this, the systematic study and identification of the predominant
gap junction protein[143] became possible.
Refined ultrastructural studies by TEM[144][145] showed protein occurred in a complementary fashion in both cells participating in a gap junction plaque. The gap junction plaque is a relatively large area of membrane observed in TEM
thin section and freeze fracture (FF) seen filled with transmembrane proteins in both tissues and more gently treated gap junction preparations. With the apparent ability for one protein alone to enable intercellular communication seen in gap junctions[146] the term gap junction tended to become synonymous with a group of assembled connexins though this was not shown in vivo. Biochemical analysis of gap junction isolated from various tissues demonstrated a family of connexins.[147][148][149]
The ultrastructure and biochemistry of isolated gap junctions already referenced had indicated the connexins preferentially group in gap junction plaques or domains and connexins were the best characterized constituent. It has been noted that the organisation of proteins into arrays with a gap junction plaque may be significant.[59][150] It is likely this early work was already reflecting the presence of more than just connexins in gap junctions. Combining the emerging fields of freeze-fracture to see inside membranes and
immunocytochemistry to label cell components (Freeze-fracture replica immunolabelling or FRIL and thin section immunolabelling) showed gap junction plaques in vivo contained the connexin protein.[151][124] Later studies using
immunofluorescence microscopy of larger areas of tissue clarified diversity in earlier results. Gap junction plaques were confirmed to have variable composition being home to connexon and non-connexin proteins as well making the modern usage of the terms "gap junction" and "gap junction plaque" non-interchangeable.[18] To summarize, in early literature the term "gap junction" referred to the regular gap between membranes in vertebrates and non-vertebrates apparently bridged by "globules". The junction correlated with the cell's ability to directly couple with its neighbors through pores in their membranes. Then for a while gap junctions were only referring to a structure that contains connexins and nothing more was thought to be involved. Later, the gap junction "plaque" was also found to contain other molecules that helped define it and make it function.
The "plaque" or "formation plaque"
Early descriptions of gap junctions, connexons or innexons did not refer to them as such; many other terms were used. It is likely that synaptic disks[152] were an accurate reference to gap junction plaques. While the detailed structure and function of the connexon was described in a limited way at the time the gross disk structure was relatively large and easily seen by various TEM techniques. Disks allowed researchers using TEM to easily locate the connexons contained within the disk like patches in vivo and in vitro. The disk or plaque appeared to have structural properties different from those imparted by the connexons/innexons alone.[67] It was thought that if the area of membrane in the plaque transmitted signals, the area of membrane would have to be sealed in some way to prevent leakage.[153]
Later studies showed gap junction plaques are home to non-connexin proteins, making the modern usage of the terms "gap junction" and "gap junction plaque" non-interchangeable as the area of the gap junction plaque may contain proteins other than connexins.[18][125] Just as connexins do not always occupy the entire area of the plaque, the other components described in the literature may be only long-term or short-term residents.[154][35][155]
Studies allowing views inside the plane of the membrane of gap junctions during formation indicated that a "formation plaque" formed between two cells prior to the connexins moving in. They were particle free areas—when observed by TEM FF, indicated very small or no
transmembrane proteins were likely present. Little is known about what structures make up the formation plaque or how the formation plaque's structure changes when connexins and other components move in and out. One of the earlier studies of the formation of small gap junctions describes rows of particles and particle free halos.[156] With larger gap junctions they were described as formation plaques with connexins moving into them. The particulate gap junctions were thought to form 4–6 hours after the formation plaques appeared.[157] How the connexins may be transported to the plaques using
tubulin is becoming clearer.[88][158]
The formation of plaque and the non-connexin part of the classical gap junction plaque have been difficult for early researchers to analyse. It appears in TEM FF and thin section to be a lipid membrane domain that can somehow form a comparatively rigid barrier to other lipids and proteins. There has been indirect evidence for certain lipids being preferentially involved with the formation plaque, however this cannot be considered definitive.[159][160] It is difficult to envisage breaking up the membrane to analyse membrane plaques without affecting their composition. By study of connexins still in membranes lipids associated with the connexins have been studied.[161] It was found that specific connexins tended to associate preferentially with specific phospholipids. As formation plaques precede connexins these results still give no certainty as to what is unique about the composition of plaques themselves. Other findings show connexins associate with protein scaffolds used in another junction, the zonula occludens
ZO-1.[162] While this helps us understand how connexins may be moved into a gap junction formation plaque, the composition of the plaque itself is still somewhat sketchy. Some headway on the in vivo composition of the gap junction plaque is being made using TEM FRIL.[154][162]
^Kelsell, David P.; Dunlop, John; Hodgins, Malcolm B. (2001). "Human diseases: clues to cracking the connexin code?". Trends in Cell Biology. 11 (1): 2–6.
doi:
10.1016/S0962-8924(00)01866-3.
PMID11146276.
^Willecke, Klaus; Eiberger, Jürgen; Degen, Joachim; Eckardt, Dominik; Romualdi, Alessandro; Güldenagel, Martin; Deutsch, Urban; Söhl, Goran (2002). "Structural and functional diversity of connexin genes in the mouse and human genome". Biological Chemistry. 383 (5): 725–37.
doi:
10.1515/BC.2002.076.
PMID12108537.
S2CID22486987.
^Robertson, J. D. (1952). Ultrastructure of an invertebrate synapse (Thesis). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
^Robertson, J. D. (1 February 1953). "Ultrastructure of Two Invertebrate Synapses". Experimental Biology and Medicine. 82 (2): 219–223.
doi:
10.3181/00379727-82-20071.
PMID13037850.
^Lampe, Paul D.; Lau, Alan F. (2000). "Regulation of gap junctions by phosphorylation of connexins". Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 384 (2): 205–15.
doi:
10.1006/abbi.2000.2131.
PMID11368307.
^Phelan, Pauline; Stebbings, Lucy A.; Baines, Richard A.; Bacon, Jonathan P.; Davies, Jane A.; Ford, Chris (January 1998). "Drosophila Shaking-B protein forms gap junctions in paired Xenopus oocytes". Nature. 391 (6663): 181–184.
Bibcode:
1998Natur.391..181P.
doi:
10.1038/34426.
PMID9428764.
S2CID205003383.
^Ganfornina, MD; Sánchez, D; Herrera, M; Bastiani, MJ (1999). "Developmental expression and molecular characterization of two gap junction channel proteins expressed during embryogenesis in the grasshopper Schistocerca americana". Developmental Genetics. 24 (1–2): 137–150.
doi:
10.1002/(SICI)1520-6408(1999)24:1/2<137::AID-DVG13>3.0.CO;2-7.
hdl:
10261/122956.
PMID10079517.
^Barbe, M. T. (1 April 2006). "Cell-Cell Communication Beyond Connexins: The Pannexin Channels". Physiology. 21 (2): 103–114.
doi:
10.1152/physiol.00048.2005.
PMID16565476.
^
abMaeda, Shoji; Nakagawa, So; Suga, Michihiro; Yamashita, Eiki; Oshima, Atsunori; Fujiyoshi, Yoshinori; Tsukihara, Tomitake (2009). "Structure of the connexin 26 gap junction channel at 3.5 A resolution". Nature. 458 (7238): 597–602.
Bibcode:
2009Natur.458..597M.
doi:
10.1038/nature07869.
PMID19340074.
S2CID4431769.
^Perkins, Guy A.; Goodenough, Daniel A.; Sosinsky, Gina E. (1998). "Formation of the gap junction intercellular channel requires a 30 degree rotation for interdigitating two apposing connexons". Journal of Molecular Biology. 277 (2): 171–7.
doi:
10.1006/jmbi.1997.1580.
PMID9514740.
^Hsieh, CL; Kumar, NM; Gilula, NB; Francke, U (Mar 1991). "Distribution of genes for gap junction membrane channel proteins on human and mouse chromosomes". Somatic Cell and Molecular Genetics. 17 (2): 191–200.
doi:
10.1007/bf01232976.
PMID1849321.
S2CID44622463.
^Kumar, NM; Gilula, NB (Feb 1992). "Molecular biology and genetics of gap junction channels". Seminars in Cell Biology. 3 (1): 3–16.
doi:
10.1016/s1043-4682(10)80003-0.
PMID1320430.
^Garfield, RE; Sims, SM; Kannan, MS; Daniel, EE (November 1978). "Possible role of gap junctions in activation of myometrium during parturition". Am. J. Physiol. 235 (5): C168–79.
doi:
10.1152/ajpcell.1978.235.5.C168.
PMID727239.
S2CID31610495.
^Goodenough, DA (November 1979). "Lens gap junctions: a structural hypothesis for nonregulated low-resistance intercellular pathways". Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 18 (11): 1104–22.
PMID511455.
^
abRobertson, JD (February 1953). "Ultrastructure of two invertebrate synapses". Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine. 82 (2): 219–23.
doi:
10.3181/00379727-82-20071.
PMID13037850.
S2CID39294652.
^Shibata, Y; Yamamoto, T (March 1977). "Gap junctions in the cardiac muscle cells of the lamprey". Cell Tissue Res. 178 (4): 477–82.
doi:
10.1007/BF00219569.
PMID870202.
S2CID21426059.
^Lorber, V; Rayns, DG (April 1977). "Fine structure of the gap junction in the tunicate heart". Cell Tissue Res. 179 (2): 169–75.
doi:
10.1007/BF00219794.
PMID858161.
S2CID21604678.
^Hama K, Saito K (February 1977). "Gap junctions between the supporting cells in some acoustico-vestibular receptors". J. Neurocytol. 6 (1): 1–12.
doi:
10.1007/BF01175410.
PMID839246.
S2CID30090247.
^Baerwald RJ (1975). "Inverted gap and other cell junctions in cockroach hemocyte capsules: a thin section and freeze-fracture study". Tissue Cell. 7 (3): 575–85.
doi:
10.1016/0040-8166(75)90027-0.
PMID1179417.
^Knudsen, KA; Horwitz, AF (1978). "Toward a mechanism of myoblast fusion". Prog Clin Biol Res. 23: 563–8.
PMID96453.
^Jones SJ, Gray C, Sakamaki H, et al. (April 1993). "The incidence and size of gap junctions between the bone cells in rat calvaria". Anat. Embryol. 187 (4): 343–52.
doi:
10.1007/BF00185892.
PMID8390141.
S2CID33191311.
^Larsen WJ, Azarnia R, Loewenstein WR (June 1977). "Intercellular communication and tissue growth: IX. Junctional membrane structure of hybrids between communication-competent and communication-incompetent cells". J. Membr. Biol. 34 (1): 39–54.
doi:
10.1007/BF01870292.
PMID561191.
S2CID2831462.
^Kelley, Robert O.; Vogel, Kathryn G.; Crissman, Harry A.; Lujan, Christopher J.; Skipper, Betty E. (March 1979). "Development of the aging cell surface. Reduction of gap junction-mediated metabolic cooperation with progressive subcultivation of human embryo fibroblasts (IMR-90)". Exp. Cell Res. 119 (1): 127–43.
doi:
10.1016/0014-4827(79)90342-2.
PMID761600.
^Bergquist, P.R.; Green, C.R. (1977). "An ultrastructural study of settlement and metamorphosis in sponge larvae". Cah. Biol. Mar. 18: 289–302.
^Green, C.R.; Bergquist, P.R. (1979). "Cell membrane specializations in the Porifera". Coll Int Cent Natn Res Scient. 291: 153–158.
^Warner, Anne E.; Guthrie, Sarah C.; Gilula, Norton B. (1984). "Antibodies to gap-junctional protein selectively disrupt junctional communication in the early amphibian embryo". Nature. 311 (5982): 127–31.
Bibcode:
1984Natur.311..127W.
doi:
10.1038/311127a0.
PMID6088995.
S2CID2620476.
^Warner, AE (2007). "The Use of Antibodies to Gap Junction Protein to Explore the Role of Gap Junctional Communication During Development". Ciba Foundation Symposium 125 - Junctional Complexes of Epithelial Cells. Novartis Foundation Symposia. Vol. 125. pp. 154–67.
doi:
10.1002/9780470513408.ch10.
ISBN9780470513408.
PMID3030673. {{
cite book}}: |journal= ignored (
help)
^Bastide, B; Jarry-Guichard, T; Briand, JP; Délèze, J; Gros, D (April 1996). "Effect of antipeptide antibodies directed against three domains of connexin43 on the gap junctional permeability of cultured heart cells". J. Membr. Biol. 150 (3): 243–53.
doi:
10.1007/s002329900048.
PMID8661989.
S2CID20408672.
^Levin, M; Mercola, M (November 1999). "Gap junction-mediated transfer of left-right patterning signals in the early chick blastoderm is upstream of Shh asymmetry in the node". Development. 126 (21): 4703–14.
doi:
10.1242/dev.126.21.4703.
PMID10518488.
^Bani-Yaghoub, Mahmud; Underhill, T. Michael; Naus, Christian C.G. (1999). "Gap junction blockage interferes with neuronal and astroglial differentiation of mouse P19 embryonal carcinoma cells". Dev. Genet. 24 (1–2): 69–81.
doi:
10.1002/(SICI)1520-6408(1999)24:1/2<69::AID-DVG8>3.0.CO;2-M.
PMID10079512.
^Bani-Yaghoub, Mahmud; Bechberger, John F.; Underhill, T. Michael; Naus, Christian C. G. (March 1999). "The effects of gap junction blockage on neuronal differentiation of human NTera2/clone D1 cells". Exp. Neurol. 156 (1): 16–32.
doi:
10.1006/exnr.1998.6950.
PMID10192774.
S2CID41420671.
^Donahue, HJ; Li, Z; Zhou, Z; Yellowley, CE (February 2000). "Differentiation of human fetal osteoblastic cells and gap junctional intercellular communication". Am. J. Physiol., Cell Physiol. 278 (2): C315–22.
doi:
10.1152/ajpcell.2000.278.2.C315.
PMID10666026.
S2CID9894657.
^Li Bi, Wan; Parysek, Linda M.; Warnick, Ronald; Stambrook, Peter J. (December 1993). "In vitro evidence that metabolic cooperation is responsible for the bystander effect observed with HSV tk retroviral gene therapy". Hum. Gene Ther. 4 (6): 725–31.
doi:
10.1089/hum.1993.4.6-725.
PMID8186287.
^Colombo, Bruno M.; Benedetti, Sara; Ottolenghi, Sergio; Mora, Marina; Pollo, Bianca; Poli, Giorgio; Finocchiaro, Gaetano (June 1995). "The "bystander effect": association of U-87 cell death with ganciclovir-mediated apoptosis of nearby cells and lack of effect in athymic mice". Hum. Gene Ther. 6 (6): 763–72.
doi:
10.1089/hum.1995.6.6-763.
PMID7548276.
^Elshami, AA; Saavedra, A; Zhang, H; Kucharczuk, JC; Spray, DC; Fishman, GI; Amin, KM; Kaiser, LR; Albelda, SM (January 1996). "Gap junctions play a role in the 'bystander effect' of the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase/ganciclovir system in vitro". Gene Ther. 3 (1): 85–92.
PMID8929915.
^Shinoura, Nobusada; Chen, Lin; Wani, Maqsood A.; Kim, Young Gyu; Larson, Jeffrey J.; Warnick, Ronald E.; Simon, Matthias; Menon, Anil G.; et al. (May 1996). "Protein and messenger RNA expression of connexin43 in astrocytomas: implications in brain tumor gene therapy". J. Neurosurg. 84 (5): 839–45, discussion 846.
doi:
10.3171/jns.1996.84.5.0839.
PMID8622159.
^Hamel, W; Magnelli, L; Chiarugi, VP; Israel, MA (June 1996). "Herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase/ganciclovir-mediated apoptotic death of bystander cells". Cancer Res. 56 (12): 2697–702.
PMID8665496.
^Sacco, MG; Benedetti, S; Duflot-Dancer, A; Mesnil, M; Bagnasco, L; Strina, D; Fasolo, V; Villa, A; et al. (December 1996). "Partial regression, yet incomplete eradication of mammary tumors in transgenic mice by retrovirally mediated HSVtk transfer 'in vivo'". Gene Ther. 3 (12): 1151–6.
PMID8986442.
^Ripps, Harris (March 2002). "Cell death in retinitis pigmentosa: gap junctions and the 'bystander' effect". Exp. Eye Res. 74 (3): 327–36.
doi:
10.1006/exer.2002.1155.
PMID12014914.
^Little, JB; Azzam, EI; De Toledo, SM; Nagasawa, H (2002). "Bystander effects: intercellular transmission of radiation damage signals". Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 99 (1–4): 159–62.
doi:
10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006751.
PMID12194273.
^Zhou, H; Randers-Pehrson, G; Suzuki, M; Waldren, CA; Hei, TK (2002). "Genotoxic damage in non-irradiated cells: contribution from the bystander effect". Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 99 (1–4): 227–32.
doi:
10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006769.
PMID12194291.
^Lorimore, SA; Wright, EG (January 2003). "Radiation-induced genomic instability and bystander effects: related inflammatory-type responses to radiation-induced stress and injury? A review". Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 79 (1): 15–25.
doi:
10.1080/0955300021000045664.
PMID12556327.
S2CID44821116.
^Rivera, EM; Vargas, M; Ricks-Williamson, L (1997). "Considerations for the aesthetic restoration of endodontically treated anterior teeth following intracoronal bleaching". Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 9 (1): 117–28.
PMID9550065.
^White, Thomas W.; Paul, David L. (1999). "Genetic diseases and gene knockouts reveal diverse connexin functions". Annual Review of Physiology. 61 (1): 283–310.
doi:
10.1146/annurev.physiol.61.1.283.
PMID10099690.
^
abGruijters, W.T.; Kistler, J.; Bullivant, S. (1 October 1987). "Formation, distribution and dissociation of intercellular junctions in the lens". Journal of Cell Science. 88 (3): 351–359.
doi:
10.1242/jcs.88.3.351.
^Young; Cohn, ZA; Gilula, NB (1987). "Functional assembly of gap junction conductance in lipid bilayers: demonstration that the major 27 kd protein forms the junctional channel". Cell. 48 (5): 733–43.
doi:
10.1016/0092-8674(87)90071-7.
PMID3815522.
S2CID39342230.