This is a
featured picture, which means that
members of the community have identified it as one of the finest images on the English Wikipedia, adding significantly to its accompanying article. If you have a different image of similar quality, be sure to
upload it using the proper
free license tag,
add it to a relevant article, and
nominate it.
This is a featured picture on the English language Wikipedia (
Featured pictures) and is considered one of the finest images. See its nomination
here.
If you think this file should be featured on Wikimedia Commons as well, feel free to
nominate it.
If you have an image of similar quality that can be published under a
suitable copyright license, be sure to
upload it,
tag it, and
nominate it.
Licensing
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
This work is in the public domain because it was published in the United States between 1929 and 1963, and although there may or may not have been a copyright notice, the copyright was not renewed. For further explanation, see
Commons:Hirtle chart and
the copyright renewal logs. Note that it may still be copyrighted in jurisdictions that do not apply the
rule of the shorter term for US works (depending on the date of the author's death), such as Canada (70 years
p.m.a.), Mainland China (50 years p.m.a., not Hong Kong or Macao), Germany (70 years p.m.a.), Mexico (100 years p.m.a.), Switzerland (70 years p.m.a.), and other countries with individual treaties.
Additional source information:
This is a publicity photo taken to promote a film actor. As stated by film production expert Eve Light Honthaner in The Complete Film Production Handbook, (Focal Press, 2001 p. 211.):
"Publicity photos have traditionally not been copyrighted. Since they are disseminated to the public, they are generally considered public domain, and therefore clearance by the studio that produced them is not necessary."
Nancy Wolff, includes a similar explanation:
"There is a vast body of photographs, including but not limited to publicity stills, that have no notice as to who may have created them." (The Professional Photographer's Legal Handbook By Nancy E. Wolff, Allworth Communications, 2007, p. 55.)
Film industry author Gerald Mast, in Film Study and the Copyright Law (1989) p. 87, writes:
"According to the old copyright act, such production stills were not automatically copyrighted as part of the film and required separate copyrights as photographic stills. The new copyright act similarly excludes the production still from automatic copyright but gives the film's copyright owner a five-year period in which to copyright the stills. Most studios have never bothered to copyright these stills because they were happy to see them pass into the public domain, to be used by as many people in as many publications as possible."
Kristin Thompson, committee chairperson of the
Society for Cinema and Media Studies writes in the conclusion of a 1993 conference with cinema scholars and editors, that they "expressed the opinion that it is not necessary for authors to request permission to reproduce frame enlargements. . . [and] some trade presses that publish educational and scholarly film books also take the position that permission is not necessary for reproducing frame enlargements and publicity photographs."
[1]
The original description page was
here. All following user names refer to en.wikipedia.
2011-03-29 01:35
Connormah 2016×2331× (1131327 bytes) {{Information |Article = James Stewart |Description = Studio publicity photo of James Stewart |Author = Studio publicity still |Date = |Source =[http://www.doctormacro.com/Images/Stewart,%20James/Annex/Annex%20-%20Stewart,
{{Information |Description={{en|Studio publicity photo of James Stewart.}}<br/> |Source=Transferred from [http://en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia]; transfer was stated to be made by
User:El Matador.<br/> (Original text : ''[http://www.doctormacro.com/Ima
File usage
The following pages on the English Wikipedia use this file (pages on other projects are not listed):