Submission declined on 7 June 2024 by
Vanderwaalforces (
talk). This submission appears to
read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a
neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of
independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's
verifiability policy and the
notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Submission declined on 4 April 2024 by
Mcmatter (
talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by
Mcmatter 2 months ago.
|
Submission declined on 3 April 2024 by
Geardona (
talk). This submission appears to
read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a
neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of
independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's
verifiability policy and the
notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by
Geardona 2 months ago. |
Submission declined on 5 December 2023 by
Greenman (
talk). This submission appears to
read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a
neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of
independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's
verifiability policy and the
notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by
Greenman 6 months ago. |
Submission declined on 30 November 2023 by
UtherSRG (
talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by
UtherSRG 6 months ago.
|
Submission declined on 17 May 2023 by
RPSkokie (
talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by
RPSkokie 12 months ago.
|
Submission declined on 3 August 2022 by
Gusfriend (
talk). This submission appears to
read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a
neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of
independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's
verifiability policy and the
notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by
Gusfriend 22 months ago. |
Submission declined on 15 March 2022 by
Behind the moors (
talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
This submission does not appear to be written in
the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a
neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of
independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid
peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by
Behind the moors 2 years ago. |
Industry | Lighting |
---|---|
Founded | 1 January 2010 |
Founders | Yuli Grig, Alexander Krupkin and Paolo Corno |
Headquarters | London, United Kingdom |
Area served | Worldwide |
Products | |
Website |
www |
Midstream Lighting Ltd [1] is a global manufacturing company that produces advanced LED high-power lighting solutions for multiple sectors [2] (including the aviation [3], sports, maritime, and military industries).
Gatwick Airport
London Gatwick Airport used Midstream Lighting to upgrade their airside lighting systems because many of the existing lights were not meeting EASA legislation. The airport also wanted to reduce the energy consumption of their airside lighting areas by 20% (compared to their 1990s levels). Midstream installed over 560 LED floodlights, making Gatwick the first airport to have a fully LED-lit and EASA-compliant apron. [4]
Glasgow Airport
Midstream Lighting worked on a project at Glasgow airport to replace existing sodium projector lights. 236 sodium projectors were replaced with just 164 LED floodlights [5], reducing the energy consumption of the lighting system by 61% and making Glasgow Airport the first international airport to ‘completely switch to LED for stand lighting’. [6]
Stoke City's Bet 365 Stadium
Midstream Lighting was involved in the floodlighting upgrade of the stadium in 2023. With the floodlighting upgrade, the stadium also has the ability to put on light shows – which is now a standard occurrence at every evening game [7] – it produces a stunning pre-match display that brings the bet365 to life in a whole new way. [8]
-
in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
-
reliable
-
secondary
-
strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.