| This is Rahio1234's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 3 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Rahio1234 reported by User:Ergzay (Result: ). Thank you.
Ergzay (
talk) 11:06, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi Rahio1234, I reverted several of your changes on several stub pages where you added citation templates. As the instructions on {{one source}} state:
Citing only one source is not a violation of any policy. Consider not adding this tag to stubs, articles that are being actively expanded, or articles that have no apparent problems with verifiability and neutrality.
I would suggest that you not add those templates to stub pages that don't seem to have obvious issues with their verifiability or neutrality. Those pages need to be expanded, not have additional sources added for their already slim content. Ergzay ( talk) 15:24, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
harassment policy, as you did at
User:Ergzay, you may be
blocked from editing. Your recent edits
[1]
[2] on my user page, blanking it and then reverting it are harrasment. Do not do that.
Ergzay (
talk) 16:37, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Ergzay (
talk) 17:25, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oh no, What happened
Rah
io
1234 07:21, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Your user talk page (this page) is not the forum to discuss an issue that is at WP:ANI. If you don't know what happened (but you do know what happened), you can look at WP:ANI, and you should look at WP:ANI anyway. Robert McClenon ( talk) 13:38, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Star
Mississippi 14:43, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Rahio1234 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Dear Wikipedians I have been blocked for some reason. Please unblock my account, Rah io 1234 15:12, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Bbb23 ( talk) 15:15, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Rahio1234 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Decline reason:
Since you don't think that you were disruptive, there are no grounds to remove the block. 331dot ( talk) 07:29, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Rahio1234 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Decline reason:
Not only is this not convincing, but 
Confirmed extensive logged-out editing, including to evade this block, in violation of
WP:LOUTSOCK.
Yamla (
talk) 12:07, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Rahio1234 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Decline reason:
That's quite enough. --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 14:05, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Please don't decline my unblock
Rah
io
1234 07:40, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- You are not permitted to edit or remove declined unblock requests for your currently active block. If you do so again, you will lose access to your talk page. You get no further warnings about this. -- Yamla ( talk) 09:18, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Rahio1234 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Decline reason:
Procedural decline; you already have an open unblock request, it's abusive to make a second simultaneous open unblock request. Additionally, this isn't providing any reason for the block to be lifted. Don't do this again. Yamla ( talk) 09:36, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.