This
level-4 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
A summary of this article appears in Law. |
Avala,
The convention on Wikipedia is that non-English language words should only be used where they are the term commonly used in English speech. Otherwise the term is translated. So the list of national legislatures has: "Knesset" and "Bundestag" (both commonly used in English speech) but "Federal Assembly" for Austria rather than the translation "Bundesversammlung" (which English speakers dont use).
Is "Skupština" actually the common term used in English? The current Wikipedia entry uses the term "Parliament of Serbia and Montenegro" but i suspect this may be incorrect as well. The only seemingly official website i could find calls it the "Assembly of Serbia and Montenegro".
Also i'm not sure i understand your objection to the Estonian legislature being listed. There is no article at present but hopefully someone will add one in future. (By the way, to avoid charges of inconsistency, according to its official site the Estonian legislature is refered to as "Riigikogu", even in English).
Iota 02:00, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)
i'm not really sure if this is what this is used for ...but i noticed while reading that someone had included the phrase "RAWR RAWR RAWR RAWR RAWR!!" in the middle paragraph under Chambers so i corrected it and took that out. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Snipesava ( talk • contribs) 20:48, 9 March 2007 (UTC).
I'm new here to Wikipedia so I have no idea how to make new posts so I'm editing someones to put mine in :). Anyways, someone added a foul comment about Legislatures working to fuck people out of office and then someone kindly added a comment about the first correspondants mother being a whorebag... I gladly edited both comments out and I explained WHY I edited it in the article. Areth naar 19:56, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
The House of Representatives may bring no charges. All bills which concern false statements must originate in the house. Because of the size of the body, debate is unnecessary in special cases, where all representatives may meet as a sub-ordinate indivisible member of the union.
Any arguments with deleting this passage? It seems to refer to the US Congress and it's too vague. — Han talk) 08:37, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
the term sasuage factory redirects to legislature. I have heard of this reference before, and incidentally i was actually interested in reading more about the use of this term to describe the legislature. however, i was quite dissapointed that wikipedia didnt deliver what was promised. i think there is a legitimate expectation that when you redirect a term, then the term should be explored on that page Yili2943 ( talk) 04:33, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
I removed the word "representative" from the first sentence, which started
A legislature is a type of representative deliberative assembly...
because a legislature is not necessarily representative. For example, non-British citizens of the commonwealth can serve in the British House of Lords. I also removed it because the reference for that statement did not claim that a legislature need be representative. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.23.145.136 ( talk) 02:49, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Do these two both really need separate articles? All that each of those articles effectively say is that these two terms are used in various places to describe either the Legislature as a whole or a specific part of it. I'm inclined to propose a merge, but thought it worth bringing the subject up here first. Brickie ( talk) 12:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
This sentence seems to be gibberish: "The internal organization of a structure is also shot by the personal egg norms that are shared by its members."
Can someone please confirm? - DC 59.101.127.98 ( talk) 02:53, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Legislature. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:43, 13 May 2017 (UTC)