This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Spaceflight This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Astronomy: Solar System Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as Mid-importance). Visual arts This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles Photography: History This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject History of photography.

The Family Portrait, or Portrait of the Planets is an image of the Solar System, created from 60 individual frames, spread over a length of six metres [...]

Why six meters? Photos are usually not measured by length, especially when they come from digital sources. -- Abdull ( talk) 10:15, 7 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Agreed. So edited. Mikaey ( talk) 08:09, 8 October 2008 (UTC) reply

Pluto was not yet classified as a dwarf planet at the time these photos were taken, and yet the article makes no mention of any attempt to include it in the portrait. If anyone knows why, I think it might deserve mention in the article -- Jleon ( talk) 15:49, 22 April 2010 (UTC) reply

It was too faint to be observable. Ruslik_ Zero 18:50, 22 April 2010 (UTC) reply

I removed the reference to Pluto as being a "dwarf planet" as that is an anachronism given that in 1990 it was considered a full planet. 70.72.215.252 ( talk) 23:07, 16 June 2012 (UTC) reply

With a careful count I can see 45 separate square images. 6 of planets, 5 in the arc over the sun, 4 in the area of the sun, 5 running parallel to the Jupiter-Earth-Venus line, 6 in the line at right angles to that (ending with frame S), 10 in the arc from S to U (not including already-counted S), and 8 in the arc out to frame N. And looking very closely int the large-resolution image I can make out 1 more almost overlapping with frame S. Total: 45. Can anyone explain where the other 15 frames are? Sean Martin ( talk) 16:00, 2 August 2013 (UTC) reply

I suppose that for some targets, several frames of the same target were taken, each one using a different colored filter, as it was the case for Pale Blue Dot, for which three frames were shot. -- Deeday-UK ( talk) 23:25, 5 January 2015 (UTC) reply

From the phrasing, it appears that an attempt was made to get a photo of Mars, but it just wasn't visible. If this is correct, could modern (c 2014) photo enhancement techniques obtain Mars from the picture/-s taken? CFLeon ( talk) 18:55, 30 September 2014 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Family Portrait (Voyager). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070717102643/http://visibleearth.nasa.gov/view_rec.php?id=599 to http://visibleearth.nasa.gov/view_rec.php?id=599

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:05, 28 September 2017 (UTC) reply

The redirect Family Portrait (Voyager has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 21 § Family Portrait (Voyager until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{( talk / cont)} 21:13, 21 February 2024 (UTC) reply